Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Levis Draft Odds?


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Pantherzilla91 said:

My opinion doesn't but my money does so...

Yeeeeaaahhh...it doesn't mean anywhere near as much as you think 😄

If you're actually stupid enough to believe there's going to be some sort of massive fan revolt if the Panthers don't take the quarterback you want, I can't help you.

Even if fans boo the choice, who gives a rat's ass? The only thing that matters is whether we win.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, t96 said:

Levis is a massive douche and I would fully believe that he would tell friends and family that he's getting picked 1st overall despite the Panthers never telling him poo. But more likely this is just made up internet bullshit and the line movement is idiots riding the wave (like that gamestop idiocy). Bryce is the guy for us

He's 24 years old and sucks at football. I cannot imagine taking an old project like Levis or Hooker in the first round, let alone 1st overall, let alone first overall where you had to trade a bunch to get there.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I ruled out Levis being our number 1 pick.... but I am excited about the possibility. This NFL draft could go down the exact same way the NBA draft went down for the orlando Magic. 

Everyone was ruling out Paolo Banchero, saying he was too slow and couldnt play 2ways in the NBA. The media and the league were thinking that Poalo would be the third player taken off the board.... Orlando Magic kept everything close to chest.....

mocks had them taking Jabari Smith or Chet Holmgren... 

 

They ended up with Paolo.. and Paolo is a bonified superstar. If this were to repeat itself in the NFL... I'd be so happy. Ofc Levis would need to be that superstar.

I don't see what they're all upset about. Panthers like dual threat QBs, the media loves Blaine Gabbert types.

TD said the were enamored by AR, well Levis may be the compromise between the Brycers and ARs in the office.

Good pick.

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

He's 24 years old and sucks at football. I cannot imagine taking an old project like Levis or Hooker in the first round, let alone 1st overall, let alone first overall where you had to trade a bunch to get there.

he's got the maturity level of a 17 year old. definitely the least mature of the bunch.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

He's 24 years old and sucks at football. I cannot imagine taking an old project like Levis or Hooker in the first round, let alone 1st overall, let alone first overall where you had to trade a bunch to get there.

yeah if we stayed at 9 and the other 3 were gone, take a shot on Levis, still probably too much of a risk to take at that position but we need a QB so ok. But at 1st overall after trading up what we did and with legit guys in Young/Stroud there, taking levis would be the biggest disaster in team history, and we've had our fair share of those

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...