Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So What Exactly Are We Doing on 3rd and 1, 4th and 1, and Goal Line Situations?


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Swaggasaurus said:

You know when you bring in a “power back” on 4th and 1 you are telegraphing quite a bit. Pretty much a handoff to that person or PA fake with a roll out. It’s one of the dumbest things that teams do. If you open your eyes you’ll see that type of thing get stuffed a lot

Except that it's a very effective play on 3rd and 1 and 4th and 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you fugers act like we are contending for the damn super bowl this upcoming season. You cannot fill all of our holes in one offseason with limited draft capital. Sorry we couldnt afford to take a power back at the top of the 2nd to appease you damn RB lovers.

Try to remember that our old coach filled our depth with crap ass temple and baylor players, the roster was barebones. Stop fuging crying before the season even starts and be happy if we make it to .500 or better. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Some of you fugers act like we are contending for the damn super bowl this upcoming season. You cannot fill all of our holes in one offseason with limited draft capital. Sorry we couldnt afford to take a power back at the top of the 2nd to appease you damn RB lovers.

Try to remember that our old coach filled our depth with crap ass temple and baylor players, the roster was barebones. Stop fuging crying before the season even starts and be happy if we make it to .500 or better. 

In all likelihood, our roster (15 free agents, 5 draft picks, and probably a few more free agents-undrafted or others) will approach 50% new players by September.  That is a lot of turnover.  At least we are weeding out the Temple, Baylor players.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Some of you fugers act like we are contending for the damn super bowl this upcoming season. You cannot fill all of our holes in one offseason with limited draft capital. Sorry we couldnt afford to take a power back at the top of the 2nd to appease you damn RB lovers.

Try to remember that our old coach filled our depth with crap ass temple and baylor players, the roster was barebones. Stop fuging crying before the season even starts and be happy if we make it to .500 or better. 

A great place to add role playing RBs in todays in NFL is the 4th and later.   Those caliber runners often went earlier in prior eras.  
 

Literally no one argues to use a top pick on a RB.  Would have been nice to keep that extra 4th from the CMC deal instead of using it in the 3rd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

See that avatar you have? Take a selfie, throw yourself in the clown makeup and update your pic because you sound like a clown.

One thing I wonder about is, whether acting like a little naysaying bitch on the internet ever gets old for some people.  Clearly for him it doesn't.

On topic though, Cam Peoples.  Next question.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

A great place to add role playing RBs in todays in NFL is the 4th and later.   Those caliber runners often went earlier in prior eras.  
 

Literally no one argues to use a top pick on a RB.  Would have been nice to keep that extra 4th from the CMC deal instead of using it in the 3rd. 

We used two picks on Johnson and filled two needs edge/te!

Seriously though, we could go with never drafting another RB just add udfa's and FA's to the position. Plenty of bruisers can fall forward for a yard. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Some of you fugers act like we are contending for the damn super bowl this upcoming season. You cannot fill all of our holes in one offseason with limited draft capital. Sorry we couldnt afford to take a power back at the top of the 2nd to appease you damn RB lovers.

Try to remember that our old coach filled our depth with crap ass temple and baylor players, the roster was barebones. Stop fuging crying before the season even starts and be happy if we make it to .500 or better. 

The poo show that was the NFCS and almost winning it last season along finally finding another QB that should be a franchise guy has some folks excited. You also have the media already saying the Panthers could win it depending on Young's development and play.

Personally, I think the Saints take the division since they're the vet team with an established system barring exceptional play by the Panthers, mostly Young and the offense, and the coaching staff living up to their hype. 2024 should be the year the Panthers starting winning the division again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

The poo show that was the NFCS and almost winning it last season along finally finding another QB that should be a franchise guy has some folks excited. You also have the media already saying the Panthers could win it depending on Young's development and play.

Personally, I think the Saints take the division since they're the vet team with an established system barring exceptional play by the Panthers, mostly Young and the offense, and the coaching staff living up to their hype. 2024 should be the year the Panthers starting winning the division again.

Sure we could win the division not arguing against that, but unless Young comes in a plays a pro bowl/all pro level we dont have a chance at the super bowl.

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...