Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More NFL News


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Howell is gonna be a week one starter in year two. Corral hopes to actually be on an NFL roster in week one of year two. I rest my case on that one.

 

 A season ending injury in first preseason might have a little affect on that.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

College football fans are wondering how he maintained eligibility and did not graduate. To play football, you must attend class and carry a certain GPA.

 Georgia better hope that the NCAA doesn’t get too interested in this subject.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/sports/other/cfb-world-laughs-at-stetson-bennett-news/ar-AA1b9tzf

Edited by ladypanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

 

 

College football fans are wondering how he maintained eligibility and did not graduate. To play football, you must attend class and carry a certain GPA.

 Georgia better hope that the NCAA doesn’t get too interested in this subject.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/sports/other/cfb-world-laughs-at-stetson-bennett-news/ar-AA1b9tzf

It can be done. Minimum credits per semester and change your major a couple times plus load up on electives. Yeah. ..there's ways you can extend your stay and burn a lot of money. A lack of focus can do that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

availability is his issue. Also, I remember correctly he has had some fumbling issues as welll.

I get that but CMC had availability issues here and we still got a nice return for him. I know he is a tier above Cook, but the talent is definitely there. I didn’t know about the fumbles though. None of these big contract RBs have really worked out…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...