Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Anti-tankers…. Never forget!!!!


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

It’s the same old responses as before. People think “pro-tankers” expect players and coaches to fail on purpose.  We know tanking is done at the FO level. 
 

JR got us Cam by tanking and Tepper tried to tank for Bryce. I guess you can’t understand.

because the players are just plastic pieces, don’t know what’s going on, and can’t tell when an organization has given up on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Ricky Prickles said:

Im an anti tanker but I feel like management possibly tried to sneaky tank last season and it didnt work out. I believe they fired Rhule who they knew was garbage after the first couple games (took long enough) and replaced him with Wilks who they thought would stink it up worse and send us into the depths of the NFL. Turns out Wilks is a thousand times the coach that Rhule ever was or will be in the NFL and it backfired on them. Had they kept our bumbling idiot as head coach we probably would have finished much worse. To top that off with our QB carousel of crap I felt like they knew we struck turd and were ready to be led there by bad coaching and turd QB'ing. The shockers were Darnold looked better with Wilks and Wilks being a good guy got the players motivated. 

I think plans became to tank but management made moves that accidentally made us gel a little better like showing Rhule the door and Wilks making Darnold look much better.

 

You caught me on Wii golf night, so I'm not really set to explain your mistakes. But rest assured, there will be a sharply worded rebuttal headed your way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

 

You caught me on Wii golf night, so I'm not really set to explain your mistakes. But rest assured, there will be a sharply worded rebuttal headed your way. 

It's just message board talk/theories/banter so take your time and relax, I don't want you suffering any sort of season ending injury on that Wii golf thing. I don't necessarily even believe what I typed fully but just throwing it out for conversation so don't sacrifice your game performance on account of little ole insignificant me.

fat guy GIF

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tanking is not trying to lose it's not trying to win. No one is going to tell players to throw games like it's the 1919 World Series.

The "win at every opportunity" move would have been to keep the best player on the team for the playoff push that year instead of trading him away for picks that Wilks would never see. It's not some organization wide conspiracy but it should be clear that everyone above the head coach had thrown in the towel at that point.  

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

Tanking is not trying to lose it's not trying to win. No one is going to tell players to throw games like it's the 1919 World Series.

The "win at every opportunity" move would have been to keep the best player on the team for the playoff push that year instead of trading him away for picks that Wilks would never see. It's not some organization wide conspiracy but it should be clear that everyone above the head coach had thrown in the towel at that point.  

 

This is what my theory is and I agree fully

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Varking said:

It worked out for the Eagles and the Jags. Eagles tanked, the Jags have their coach now and went to the playoffs with him. Eagles new coach lead the team to a Super Bowl run. Indy is TBD but they are becoming a poorly run organization that elite QB play can’t cover up anymore. 

I guess I'm just confused about your argument.  Why do we keep roping the Jags into an argument about tanking again?  Because they hired the coach that the tankers fired?  Seems irrelevant to the discussion.  Or if it is relevant, it'd almost be an argument against tanking because you tanking just inadvertently helped improve another competitor.  Now if you want to argue that they tanked for Trevor Lawrence, that'd be different, but I don't recall an egregious tank job that year rather than the Jags just being a genuinely awful team.

Also the way you keep framing it as "it worked out" - is your argument that tanking just didn't ultimately harm the Eagles?  Or that it actually meaningfully contributed to their success today?  I think losing that last game of the season improved their draft position by a few slots, which of course objectively is better.  But I think most everyone would agree that their success is primarily attributed to Jalen Hurts (who they already had drafted before the tank), the coaching staff that developed him (they could have replaced the coaching staff without tanking, teams do that every year), and all the key 2022 offseason acquisitions.

It's also worth noting that the league doesn't agree with your characterization that the Eagles tanked.  They investigated it and they could have penalized the Eagles (including taking draft picks), but they decided against it.  So even the most egregious example of "tanking" you can think of in recent years, is by no means an accepted position.  It was too close of a call where I don't think it's worth it to improve your draft position by 3 slots for even a 10-20% chance that the league is going to dock you one or more draft picks.  I'm sure Goodell and the league are very motivated to crack down on tanking and make an example out of a team.  Just because it ultimately "worked out" for the Eagles, doesn't mean it's a success story that should inspire other teams to do the same.

Speaking of which - yeah I agree that Indy is a poorly run organization.  That being said, I'd generally advocate not emulating the strategies of a poorly run organization.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

It’s the same old responses as before. People think “pro-tankers” expect players and coaches to fail on purpose.  We know tanking is done at the FO level. 
 

JR got us Cam by tanking and Tepper tried to tank for Bryce. I guess you can’t understand.

That's B.S. Our FO has never tried to tank. JR was making a statement in regards to the CBA that began before the season even started. He was clearing house for a rebuild. Tepper already told you that he doesn't believe in so-called "tanking." It doesn't even matter because players aren't going to tank, period. They are professionals. The term "any given Sunday" exists for a reason. Moreover, players and coaches will always provide a firewall against the whims of an unscrupulous owner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I guess I'm just confused about your argument.  Why do we keep roping the Jags into an argument about tanking again?  Because they hired the coach that the tankers fired?  Seems irrelevant to the discussion.  Or if it is relevant, it'd almost be an argument against tanking because you tanking just inadvertently helped improve another competitor.  Now if you want to argue that they tanked for Trevor Lawrence, that'd be different, but I don't recall an egregious tank job that year rather than the Jags just being a genuinely awful team.

Also the way you keep framing it as "it worked out" - is your argument that tanking just didn't ultimately harm the Eagles?  Or that it actually meaningfully contributed to their success today?  I think losing that last game of the season improved their draft position by a few slots, which of course objectively is better.  But I think most everyone would agree that their success is primarily attributed to Jalen Hurts (who they already had drafted before the tank), the coaching staff that developed him (they could have replaced the coaching staff without tanking, teams do that every year), and all the key 2022 offseason acquisitions.

It's also worth noting that the league doesn't agree with your characterization that the Eagles tanked.  They investigated it and they could have penalized the Eagles (including taking draft picks), but they decided against it.  So even the most egregious example of "tanking" you can think of in recent years, is by no means an accepted position.  It was too close of a call where I don't think it's worth it to improve your draft position by 3 slots for even a 10-20% chance that the league is going to dock you one or more draft picks.  I'm sure Goodell and the league are very motivated to crack down on tanking and make an example out of a team.  Just because it ultimately "worked out" for the Eagles, doesn't mean it's a success story that should inspire other teams to do the same.

Speaking of which - yeah I agree that Indy is a poorly run organization.  That being said, I'd generally advocate not emulating the strategies of a poorly run organization.

The league isn’t going to want to admit that the eagles tanked to end their season. It doesn’t want to admit ANY team ever tanks. I’m not making a stance advocating for tanking. I’m pointing out tanking happens and while it might not have helped the eagles, it doesn’t really hurt them either. They’ve been able to still sign free agents to come in, even Kelce who was furious with the team for tanking that game, stayed with the team. 
 

I don’t want to argue for or against tanking. I just want folks to stop holding their hands over their eyes trying to pretend there hasn’t been forms of tanking in the NFL before, even recently. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, top dawg said:

That's B.S. Our FO has never tried to tank. JR was making a statement in regards to the CBA that began before the season even started. He was clearing house for a rebuild. Tepper already told you that he doesn't believe in so-called "tanking." It doesn't even matter because players aren't going to tank, period. They are professionals. The term "any given Sunday" exists for a reason. Moreover, players and coaches will always provide a firewall against the whims of an unscrupulous owner. 

Players won’t tank. Coaches and GMs? Owners? Hard to say. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The sooner you realize the goal for any owner is not a Lombardi the better off you'll be.

Its Asses In Seats (AIS).

Yeah a Lombardi is nice and all and it can in the short term boost those AIS numbers but its a short term thing unless you can figure out how to build the next Patriots Dynasty.

 

Loosing on purpose.  That's antithetical to those AIS numbers and a damned fine way to scuttle AIS numbers for seasons to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This article (ESPN) got me thinking and I think on paper.  Thought I would share.  This thinking involves realistic cap analysis, needs, the draft, and free agency.  I think it realistically addresses Edge and LB fairly well.  OL (not 2026 so much, but 2027 and beyond looks good).  The free agent S has deep range and coverage skills, something that killed us on third downs last year, imo.  Beyond Edge, LB, S, and OL depth, that is about it.  I took a flyer on DT and WR depth late in the draft, but at CB (Horn, Jackson, Smith-Wade, and Thornton), QB, RB, TE, etc. we are going to rely on undrafted free agents.  No cap room left. EDGE:  In the $7m per year range, the edge from Atlanta Ebiketie got pressure at a high rate in reduced snaps. With Atlanta adding 2 edge rushers as rookies who seemed to do well (Pearce is one of them--*) but he got pressure in limited snaps at a high rate 16.9% (one in eight pass rush).   He is 27 and played in 384 snaps.  PFF Score of 74.9.  had 2 sacks.  If he had a normal workload, based on his limited play, he would have had about 5 to 6 sacks and about 60 pressures.  However, it is likely he would be rotational here, logging about 500 snaps.   A lot of this decision depends on how we feel about Princely.  If they like his development, you probably do not draft an Edge in round 1 or maybe even 2 for several reasons (and many may disagree with this logic, but a good GM has long-term vision):  1. That would give you 3 Edge contracts to negotiate in 3-4 years.  2.  Edges take time to develop.  They would peak around 2028.  The Panthers are in "win now" mode, I think. Mafe (Seahawks, PFF 69.2) is another option, but he is more along the lines of Scourton and Jones II.  He would command a contract in the $10m range. Kwity Paye (Indianapolis, PFF 68.7) He is about 28 and is expected to sign a deal around $18m per season.  I am not that impressed, but he is considered "above average."  I'd rather have Ebiketie from Atlanta for $10m per season less. Center:  The center position in the draft is looking better.  There are some short armed OTs (like Parker, Duke, et al) who will project inside (G,C). Personally, I like the Center position in this draft--let Mays walk.  Re-sign Corbett, and draft a C in round 3.   Linebacker:  I am not sure what we should do here.   I think Morgan will fall in love with Cincinnati's Golday, and we would take him at #51.  Rodriguez (Texas Tech) in round 3 could be a steal.  However, I am not sure that I see value after Styles in round 1.  I think Devin Lloyd will want elite meny and he is not elite--he is good.  He will ask for $15m per season.  Leo Chenel (KC, 75.1 PFF, est. $5m) is a much better option. Safety:  I think Kam Curl would be a great fit here. (Rams, 2 Ints 87 tackles) he is very versatile. Expected to get between $10m and $12m per year, however.  In the draft, I think they like Bud Clark who should be there in round 4.  Are Moehrig, Ransom, and Simmons enough?  Tony Adams (63.7 PFF) a deep safety known for his range.  He is expected to get a 3-year, $20m deal on the market. Based on what I am seeing here and the way I am thinking right now on 2/21, here is what I might do: Free Agency CAP: I am going to assume we can clear about $50m by restructuring the contracts of Horn, Lewis, Hunt, and Brown and cutting AShawn Robinson.  We could (bold move) extend Ickey Ekwonu--considering his situation, it could be beneficial to him long term, and his guaranteed salary could be spread over the next 3 years or so. Re-sign veterans:  OL:  Corbett ($3m), Nijman ($4m), Christensen ($2.5m--2 years $5m), Jake Curhan ($1.4m-2 years, $3m).  BC may be ready around mid season, Curhan has experience at RT and G, and played well.  He has played LT in preseason.  There is NOTHING in free agency at LT--most sucked in 2025 and/or are old.  WR: Jalen Coker ($8m--4 years, $32m), LB: Rozeboom ($3.5--2 years, $7m) Cherelus ($1m)  ST: Isiah Simmons ($1.5m).  TOTAL:  Approx. $25m New Free Agents:  Linebacker:  Leo Chenal (KC, age 26) estimated $5m. Safety:  Tony Adams, (NYJ, age 27)  estimated $7m Edge: Arnold Ebikete (Atl, age 27)  estimated $7m Draft: Round 1:  Cashius Howell, Edge Texas AM (This pick gives the Panthers a situational edge rusher to pair with Princely while Ebikete and Scourton start.  Jones II could be cut to save about $4m in cap room. Round 2: Caleb Tiernan, LT, Northwestern (Good pass protector who needs work in run blocking.  I wanted Golday LB here, but if we sign Chenel, the need is lessened at LB if we re-sign Rozeboom. Tiernan is solid). Round 3:  Jake Slaughter C, Florida (Groom behind Corbett for a while, but Slaughter is an impressive C who should be ready by 2027). Round 4:  Demetrius Crownover, RT Texas AM (This guy can develop as a backup until Moton decides to leave) Round 5:  Aiden Fisher, ILB Indiana (could be a nice fit in this system.  Smart, with special teams ability)' Round 6: Ty Montgomery, WR John Carroll Univ.  (very productive with good size and hands.  a gamble, but worth a sixth) Round 7:  James Thompson Jr.  DT, Illinois (was a beast at the Shrine bowl practices and game.  For some reason, there have been a lot of undrafted free agents and day 3 DTs succeed in the NFL.  This could be one.)                          
    • thats the best picture they could come up with for him?
×
×
  • Create New...