Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we stop blaming Kasey


Panther53521
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, OneBadCat said:

The Cam fumble thing is way overblown imo. 

He didn't dive on the ball for two reasons. 1. He was anticipating the ball changing direction. 2. He was too tall to just drop immediately on top of it. 

False - Cam made a business decision to not dive on the fumble and admitted this in an interview.  

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Those topics have been beaten to death since the spring

you're spending your time on the wrong site if you don't wanna talk about that stuff over something that happened 20 years ago lmfao.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GOAT said:

it's 2023.

we're a couple weeks away from our new #1 pick QB and new coaching staff taking the field.

and the number one thread on this forum is about something that happened in 2003.

woo boy.

Its a Panthers message board right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, djp14 said:

I didn't like the call, but I understood it.

Up until that td drive, we had 130 yards in total offense.  And it was the 4th quarter. Bottom line, if we convert the first 2 pt conversion, we eventually have a 25-21 lead, and probably win the game. If we only converted the 2nd, we probably go to OT.

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

Yeah, about cheating our way to a superbowl ,cause Sauerbran and Donnely were caught using steroids, and the national media framed it like a team wide issue 

Op is right though, those 20 yards meant nothing to Brady and Welker , they were going to nickel and dime our gassed defense if they got it at the 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/20/2023 at 11:05 AM, OneBadCat said:

Link?

He can’t provide one because it’s false. He said in an interview he anticipated it bouncing out and that’s why he raised up. He couldn’t get there before the defender that was already lower than him so he was playing the bounce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Newton would go on to explain a day later: “I didn’t dive on one fumble because the way my leg was (positioned). It could have been contorted in a way. You say my effort? I didn’t dive down. I fumbled—that’s fine. That’s fine. We didn’t lose the game because of that fumble.”

https://www.si.com/nfl/2016/02/11/cam-newton-dive-fumble-super-bowl-50-carolina-panthers-nfl

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, lightsout said:

 

Or we just take the PATs, everything else goes precisely the same, and we are having a very different conversation right now.

Yep, people forget that…
If we kick the PAT’s, then NE doesn’t go for 2 and make it. That’s a 3 point swing and their final drive is for a tie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...