Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Lions at Panthers damn it's hot out GameDay thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

He had already made the catch, but lost it when the db was swatting at it. He did not have the ball secured when he hit the pylon. The ball was basically in the air. He could not regain control of a fumble out of bounds.

Exactly. Same concept if he fumbled at the 1 and it rolled out of the back of the end zone.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cdparr7 said:

Exactly. Same concept if he fumbled at the 1 and it rolled out of the back of the end zone.

Bingo! I don't know why some are having such a hard time with it. If Peoples had the ball secured when he touched the line, it would've been a TD. You can't secure a fumble out of bounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Bingo! I don't know why some are having such a hard time with it. If Peoples had the ball secured when he touched the line, it would've been a TD. You can't secure a fumble out of bounds.


How is it a fumble if it never hits the ground? That’s just a bobble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tbe said:


How is it a fumble if it never hits the ground? That’s just a bobble. 

He had already established the catch. There was no bobble. The DB swatting the ball either caused Peoples to lose the ball physically and/or mentally. Either way, People's did NOT have control once he hit the end zone. The ball was fumbled out of bounds through the side of the end zone. People's got control out of bounds. Too late!

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, at the time that wouldn't have worked for them. The truth is that when they had the biggest advantage in that conversation was also when Notre Dame was at their peak arrogance and revenue stream creation(prior to the Longhorns Network, etc). Notre Dame was just never going to work out. The biggest thing they could have done is go hard AF and try to give insane deals to the premier Big 12 teams. Even then, most of them were eyeing the Big Ten and SEC. The biggest issue with the ACC was betting wrong. Miami and Virginia Tech ended up being disasters. Basically former college football powerhouses that ended up being afterthoughts by the time they arrived. I mean Miami specifically have literally had a total of three double digit win seasons since they joined the ACC in 2004 and two of those are in the past 2 seasons. Virginia Tech just fell apart at the wrong time, although I think Franklin will bring them back to prominence to an extent. Had we had it to do in hindsight, probably taking teams like TCU, Baylor, etc would have been wiser options than some of the moves into the Northeast and getting Miami.   But, ultimately, fug all this nonsense. It's the insane greed of college football that killed regional rivalries, college basketball and entire storied, REGIONAL conferences. That is the real blame. The thirst for the destruction of all college sports which sits squarely at the feet of the slobbering, ignorant rednecks and hillbillies at the top of the college football sphere.
    • Im wondering how long it will take me to turn the game off
×
×
  • Create New...