Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots claim Matt Corral


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I mean this entire situation, even if it doesn't amount to anything, is way better resource management than us. 

Lol ok. Because they've shown to be experts in their ability to use draft picks over the years.

Sorry. Falls into blind squirrel finding a half eaten nut territory.

We traded up a little with them  to get a third round QB who has proven he's not able to prove he belongs on a roster as a backup and the team we get the picks from goes "ahHa! We'll just go ahead and pick up that bad thing you overpaid for and decided it wasn't a good purchase and discarded!" And that makes them smarter?

They've done nothing but flail around blind these last few years. He's totally mishandled his QBs and offense since losing Brady.

Sorry, if this is a "win" for him he can have it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible. 
 

I think we are in good hands with Young. I just would have liked to keep Corral around as a fall back until we KNEW we were in good hands with Young. 
 

Good for Corral though. He instantly has the most physical talent in their QB room. Now the Pats get a free shot at taking a raw thrower and seeing if he can be an NFL quarterback. 
 

And if that doesn’t happen, that trade still looks hilarious that we basically gave the Pats two 3rds and a 4th for funzies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Lol ok. Because they've shown to be experts in their ability to use draft picks over the years.

Sorry. Falls into blind squirrel finding a half eaten nut territory.

We traded up a little with them  to get a third round QB who has proven he's not able to prove he belongs on a roster as a backup and the team we get the picks from goes "ahHa! We'll just go ahead and pick up that bad thing you overpaid for and decided it wasn't a good purchase and discarded!" And that makes them smarter?

They've done nothing but flail around blind these last few years. He's totally mishandled his QBs and offense since losing Brady.

Sorry, if this is a "win" for him he can have it.

I never expected him to beat out Dalton. Those are completely unrealistic expectations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a 3rd QB.  We are all concerned about Bryce getting injured. Andy has recently  had back issues.  In any game we could get to QB #3 before halftime.  Zappe did ok in live action.  Getting him would be funny too.  But we do  need someone who can come in and play.

Belichick has been making some strange decisions  the last couple of years.

Edited by ladypanther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

We need a 3rd QB.  We are all concerned about Bryce getting injured. Andy has recently  had back issues.  In any game we could get to QB #3 before halftime.  Zappe did ok in live action.  Getting him would be funny too.  But wedo  need someone who can come in and play.

Belichick has been making some strange decisions  the last couple of years.

Belichick has not been the same person since Brady departed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if I'm being a homer and think BB hasn't done jack poo since Brady left I can't overlook the fact our drafts overall the last few years have been not too good. There isn't a striking difference from some of the Hurney drafts despite the hype Fitterer has received. I'm sincerely hoping that changes with this years draft class though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

How is this his fault? Never mind, I don't want to even understand that level of stupidity.  

The idiots he hired wasted resources. He is a hands on owner and wants the credit and doesn’t understand he’s incapable. Everything comes back to him as such. Are you dumb?

You’re a the owner can do no wrong poster and just insult other posters when they call out their BS. 

Why don’t you ignore people who disagree with you in that the FO is always making the best decisions and never to blame? This question doesn’t need and answer.

Edited by onmyown
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I had started typing my post hours ago and didn’t finish it and just came back to finish it, posted it, then saw yours and saw we were pretty much saying the same thing - even the games that stick out to us most.  I don’t think a lot of people remember that SF playoff game, but I felt like I had just got mugged in broad daylight.  I remember them calling Mitchell for unnecessary roughness, and then I remember watching Boldin take a super late cheap shot, dead in front of the ref and then showing him watching the whole thing in replay…  the refs let them have a fuging field day and didn’t do jack poo, but if we so much as breathed the wrong way it was fuging 15 yards.  Each team playing under two completely different sets of rules.  poo hurt.  I was enraged.  I’ve never went back to watch either that game or SB50 and never will.  fuging robbery.
    • I’ve said it a million times since, but it’s impossible to keep them from affecting the game.  In SB50, they literally took the game from us, and they did it early.  Cotchery’s no-catch?  The miraculous amount of times we converted for a first down only to have it suddenly called back make it a 3rd down and 15+ against the best defense in the league that specialized in rushing the passer and man coverage on the back end?  And you do that enough times, you kill the morale and confidence of the team you’re doing it against.  It’s telling the one team “you can do whatever with impunity” and the other “you can’t do whatever they’re allowed to do.”  It changes the aggression level.  It essentially neuters one team and allows the other to do whatever the fug they want.  Imagine you call the police for help and they get there and tell you to sit still while the other party beats the poo out of you and you can’t defend yourself.  That’s what the officials do.  There is no way to avoid them affecting the game.  And more often than not, it’s the most subjective calls they use to do so.  Even in SB50…  you saw the Broncos commit more egregious penalties than anything we did, and barely any of it was called.  Their OL was holding all fuging game and the refs did nothing.  We already had our work cut out for us against two future HOF edge rushers and the refs played to their advantage with that.  From what I remember, both Oher and Remmers were called for holding at various times and their hands were in the INSIDE of the defender.  It was garbage, but all by design. Also, if there is any video of it anywhere, go look at what the refs did against us back in 2013 against SF.  The fix was in there too.  They stepped in early and often and ensured we knew we were not allowed to play with the same aggression or intensity SF was.  It was disgusting as well. at this point, I hope Vince McMahon, errr, I mean Goodell just finally scripts us to win it, because this poo is not won via competition or off merit.
    • You can go back to the New York Knicks somehow getting Patrick Ewing.  I saw a story where they place the New York Knick card in the freezer right before the drawing.  It was simple.  Show everyone the cards are undetectable to the human eye.  All they had to do was grab the coldest card. IMO ever since Goodell took over the NFL it has been fishy.  Patriots winning the SB after 9/11, New Orleans after Katrina and Peyton Manning's going away gift against us. The terrible calls during that game were blatantly one sided.  New England should have been stripped of their first 3 SB when they were caught spying on the other team in their SB wins.  I think the evidence against the Patriots was so damning Goodell felt it could ruin football and they brushed it under the table.   In the 2004 SB, How did we go from practically no yards in the first Quarter to setting a record in the 3rd Qtr.  Dan Henning changes the game plan.  IMO probably the greatest half time adjustment of all time.  
×
×
  • Create New...