Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots claim Matt Corral

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Ricky Spanish said:

I mean this entire situation, even if it doesn't amount to anything, is way better resource management than us. 

Lol ok. Because they've shown to be experts in their ability to use draft picks over the years.

Sorry. Falls into blind squirrel finding a half eaten nut territory.

We traded up a little with them  to get a third round QB who has proven he's not able to prove he belongs on a roster as a backup and the team we get the picks from goes "ahHa! We'll just go ahead and pick up that bad thing you overpaid for and decided it wasn't a good purchase and discarded!" And that makes them smarter?

They've done nothing but flail around blind these last few years. He's totally mishandled his QBs and offense since losing Brady.

Sorry, if this is a "win" for him he can have it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted

Incredible. 
 

I think we are in good hands with Young. I just would have liked to keep Corral around as a fall back until we KNEW we were in good hands with Young. 
 

Good for Corral though. He instantly has the most physical talent in their QB room. Now the Pats get a free shot at taking a raw thrower and seeing if he can be an NFL quarterback. 
 

And if that doesn’t happen, that trade still looks hilarious that we basically gave the Pats two 3rds and a 4th for funzies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Lol ok. Because they've shown to be experts in their ability to use draft picks over the years.

Sorry. Falls into blind squirrel finding a half eaten nut territory.

We traded up a little with them  to get a third round QB who has proven he's not able to prove he belongs on a roster as a backup and the team we get the picks from goes "ahHa! We'll just go ahead and pick up that bad thing you overpaid for and decided it wasn't a good purchase and discarded!" And that makes them smarter?

They've done nothing but flail around blind these last few years. He's totally mishandled his QBs and offense since losing Brady.

Sorry, if this is a "win" for him he can have it.

I never expected him to beat out Dalton. Those are completely unrealistic expectations.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ladypanther Grand Master

ladypanther

Posted
Posted (edited)

We need a 3rd QB.  We are all concerned about Bryce getting injured. Andy has recently  had back issues.  In any game we could get to QB #3 before halftime.  Zappe did ok in live action.  Getting him would be funny too.  But we do  need someone who can come in and play.

Belichick has been making some strange decisions  the last couple of years.

Edited by ladypanther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

We need a 3rd QB.  We are all concerned about Bryce getting injured. Andy has recently  had back issues.  In any game we could get to QB #3 before halftime.  Zappe did ok in live action.  Getting him would be funny too.  But wedo  need someone who can come in and play.

Belichick has been making some strange decisions  the last couple of years.

Belichick has not been the same person since Brady departed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

Even if I'm being a homer and think BB hasn't done jack poo since Brady left I can't overlook the fact our drafts overall the last few years have been not too good. There isn't a striking difference from some of the Hurney drafts despite the hype Fitterer has received. I'm sincerely hoping that changes with this years draft class though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

How is this his fault? Never mind, I don't want to even understand that level of stupidity.  

The idiots he hired wasted resources. He is a hands on owner and wants the credit and doesn’t understand he’s incapable. Everything comes back to him as such. Are you dumb?

You’re a the owner can do no wrong poster and just insult other posters when they call out their BS. 

Why don’t you ignore people who disagree with you in that the FO is always making the best decisions and never to blame? This question doesn’t need and answer.

Edited by onmyown
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...