Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers and Brian Burns not at all close to extension


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 9/3/2023 at 6:01 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

We might be the only fanbase in the country who talks crap about our best players.

 

 

Talk crap how? By saying he’s got delusional contract demands? Tf you want me to say? “Burns is the best edge ever pay him 30mm a year bc he’s on our team! Sunshine and rainbows!”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Castavar said:

Chris Jones not playing, Nick Bosa most likely not going to play, I'd be HIGHLY surprised if Burns plays without a contract this Sunday.

Word is that 49ers are actually fielding calls for Bosa as they don't want to budge the gap from their offer of 28m up to what Bosa asked for which is at least 31.5m aav. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Word is that 49ers are actually fielding calls for Bosa as they don't want to budge the gap from their offer of 28m up to what Bosa asked for which is at least 31.5m aav. 

seriously?  they're going to risk losing Bosa over 3.5 per year?  that's like a rounding error in cap management in the long run, that's just dumb.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

woo

 

I'm sure a few of them have contracts that can be restructured by converting the season's salary into a roster bonus so it can be spread along the rest of the contract while taking the vet minimum on the season to help get the cap down.

Keeping highly paid rosters together is much easier than bringing in highly paid talent because you can find ways to keep restructuring and kicking the can down the road.  Eventually you'll have to pay the toll, but you hope at that point you're into the re-build like the Saints did with the Brees era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I'm sure a few of them have contracts that can be restructured by converting the season's salary into a roster bonus so it can be spread along the rest of the contract while taking the vet minimum on the season to help get the cap down.

Keeping highly paid rosters together is much easier than bringing in highly paid talent because you can find ways to keep restructuring and kicking the can down the road.  Eventually you'll have to pay the toll, but you hope at that point you're into the re-build like the Saints did with the Brees era.

All that and they're rolling with Purdy and Darnold, wild how that shook out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We have seen Bryce get outplayed by all manner of QBs, from UDFAs to second round picks.  If we actually scouted any QBs it would not be a difficult task to upgrade from Bryce, you guys act like he is even decent. He is one of the worst starters league wide stop making excuses.   
    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...