Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Saints at Panthers MNF thread

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted

Anti-Brycers enjoy the huddle this week. Not a great game. Disappointed our coaches haven’t been able to scheme anybody open. Mingo looks uncomfortable catching passes. Not just the drop but even his big catch on the final drive he was bobbling. We just don’t have playmakers it’s going to  be rough for Bryce but he’s looked ok all things considered. Optimistic for the future, all you negative Nancy’s have fun whining I’m sure it’s very enjoyable to constantly whine.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Navy_football said:

Honestly, offensive playcalling is killing this team more than anything. It's like they don't know our WRs need help getting open. 

Bryce has to focus on AT because he's the only route runner on the team. Unfortunately he can't stay open for long because he's a turtle by NFL WR standards. 

That’s on Reich (I agree with you). I’m not or have never been impressed with Frank. I’ve said this before, I live in colts country, they spent years complaining to me about how bad he is, then laughed when we hired him. I’m still hoping he proves them wrong, but it ain’t looking good. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

That’s on Reich (I agree with you). I’m not or have never been impressed with Frank. I’ve said this before, I live in colts country, they spent years complaining to me about how bad he is, then laughed when we hired him. I’m still hoping he proves them wrong, but it ain’t looking good. 

He's not a creative playcaller. That doesn't mean he's a bad HC. Just give up the playcalling to your OC. You know the guy that was hired to call plays. 

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

That’s on Reich (I agree with you). I’m not or have never been impressed with Frank. I’ve said this before, I live in colts country, they spent years complaining to me about how bad he is, then laughed when we hired him. I’m still hoping he proves them wrong, but it ain’t looking good. 

This is true, BUT we have dogshit weapons 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DavidEng Grand Master

DavidEng

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Anti-Brycers enjoy the huddle this week. Not a great game. Disappointed our coaches haven’t been able to scheme anybody open. Mingo looks uncomfortable catching passes. Not just the drop but even his big catch on the final drive he was bobbling. We just don’t have playmakers it’s going to  be rough for Bryce but he’s looked ok all things considered. Optimistic for the future, all you negative Nancy’s have fun whining I’m sure it’s very enjoyable to constantly whine.

I haven’t given up on Bryce yet but two games in it’s clear he has a long way to go and it’s fair to question when or even if he gets there. 

The play calling sucks and with mediocre WRs they need plays to get them open. A lot for a rookie QB to overcome. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deltek44 Contributor

Deltek44

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Anti-Brycers enjoy the huddle this week. Not a great game. Disappointed our coaches haven’t been able to scheme anybody open. Mingo looks uncomfortable catching passes. Not just the drop but even his big catch on the final drive he was bobbling. We just don’t have playmakers it’s going to  be rough for Bryce but he’s looked ok all things considered. Optimistic for the future, all you negative Nancy’s have fun whining I’m sure it’s very enjoyable to constantly whine.

Honestly I am not up for being an anti-Brycer and want to see more and always want to support the team good and bad but lets be honest he doesnt pass the eye test.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • 45catfan
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...