Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce DNP in practice 9-20-23


Samppson
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Honestly, the feeding frenzy on this site makes a statement that people ARE hoping he fails.  They seem to revel in it.  It may not be you, but take a breath and read the posts in one of the endless threads since Monday.

I'll admit, I got to that point with The Process......after two years, not two games.

 

6 coaches in 28 years 

about 30 plus qbs 

no back to back winning seasons 

will do that 

post traumatic panthers fanship or franchise  

PTPF

peoplw have gotten tired of being either everyone else’s get well story or good ending story 

Edited by raleigh-panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

6 coaches in 28 years 

about 30 plus qbs 

no back to back winning seasons 

will do that 

post traumatic panthers fanship or franchise  

PTPF

peoplw have gotten tired of being either everyone else’s get well story or good ending story 

The latest chapter is only two games in.

We don't know sh-t yet.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is what I was thinking. If the ankle is legit dinged it's a good excuse to give him an opportunity to step back and not set him up for another failure going on the road to Seattle on a short week. The real entertainment begins if Dalton actually plays surprisingly well.

Don't be suprised if he does. A vet who has been around the block a few times and still has a good arm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 33inNC said:

What a waste of a pick, especially trading all we did. Dude is too small to be a franchise QB and won't be durable enough. 

He is smaller then Brees. Brees was small compared to a prototype NFL QB. Players like Brees don't come along often. He is not going to be another Brees.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...