Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Video: TFG Breakdown


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

This guy is good, he understands a lot of NFL concepts. Also, there's not much pre-analysis bs/he gets right to the point.  Good breakdown, shows he's processing but making some rookie mistakes.

Stuff to learn from.  Doesn't push me overly into pushy or complacent territory, but there's a bit for him to work on.

 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really well done and thorough analysis. He showed the good and the bad. JT O’Sullivan didn’t show as many of the “negative” plays for Bryce. This guy does a better job of showing the whole picture. And the overall takeaway is still the same as JT’s: that Bryce has done a lot of good things and has been hampered by his situation. Yes, there’s still been some rookie bad too, but he hasn’t played all that poorly and a lot of the lack of production has come down to the circumstances of offensive architecture and the execution of his teammates.  I was already less doom and gloom than a lot of others here on the Huddle, but this video has me more optimistic for the future (even if I’m still overall pessimistic for this season). 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To summarize this video, this guy shows where Bryce has certainly had his share of bad plays but how most of his two games have been spent throwing nothing but anticipation balls to coverd / quiting recivers. Talks about lack of play creativity and how Bryce can certainly still take easier plays that are there.

Mostly, he says and shows that Bryce is playing well above what the stats show, obviously. He also agrees with the team "resting" Bryce while they go to Seattle and learn a little more about how to run their offense. 

It was a good video with no Homer bias.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually am concerned about him being able to see over the line. The first INT seems like one where he has self admittedly said he sometimes throws to the proper spot even if he can't see over the line. That must be the one that Reich took the blame for and said the safety "cheated". The next handful after that there are NFL open guys but he's not seeing them for one reason or another but most seem to require him being able to physically see them over the lineman. That or he's scared to throw in/across the middle after those picks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

I know it’s a general term, but reading/hearing “processing” is wearing thin. 
 

I’ve never heard it used this much for any other player.

 

At the end of the day, this is football; not rocket biology. 

Sir I’m going to need you to process the way we’re processing the process of one of the best processors 

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cam's New Arm said:

To summarize this video, this guy shows where Bryce has certainly had his share of bad plays but how most of his two games have been spent throwing nothing but anticipation balls to coverd / quiting recivers. Talks about lack of play creativity and how Bryce can certainly still take easier plays that are there.

Mostly, he says and shows that Bryce is playing well above what the stats show, obviously. He also agrees with the team "resting" Bryce while they go to Seattle and learn a little more about how to run their offense. 

It was a good video with no Homer bias.

Processing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I actually am concerned about him being able to see over the line. The first INT seems like one where he has self admittedly said he sometimes throws to the proper spot even if he can't see over the line. That must be the one that Reich took the blame for and said the safety "cheated". The next handful after that there are NFL open guys but he's not seeing them for one reason or another but most seem to require him being able to physically see them over the lineman. That or he's scared to throw in/across the middle after those picks

It had nothing to do with him seeing over the line.  More of the latter.  I think the safety not dropping back on the interceptions made him a little more hesitant to just pull the trigger on some throws.  But it was his first game in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...