Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Terrified Cj stroud will be a stud


Frank9999
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

He's had a pretty good connection percentage with Theilen, and hasn't really targeted Chark. The only receiver whose been targeted plenty with a low connection rate is Mingo. 

So where are all these drops coming from?

I remember a bad drop from Mingo on a slant on 3rd down. But yeah, I don't think Bryce's mom could come up with a dozen plus plays where receivers botched a tremendous throw from Bryce.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

He's had a pretty good connection percentage with Theilen, and hasn't really targeted Chark. The only receiver whose been targeted plenty with a low connection rate is Mingo. 

So where are all these drops coming from?

Our wide receivers literally havent dropped anything YET outside of Mingo last week. Thank you for pointing out another fact and not an opinion. Lol 

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

I NEVER said that. I said his guys are open and he's finding them. He's playing very well. They were always 1a and 1b in the draft to me. Just who fits your offense. 

Fair enough - i would say the Texans scheme simply seems much better than ours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Our wide receivers literally havent dropped anything YET outside of Mingo last week. Thank you for pointing out another fact and not an opinion. Lol 

Dropped or couldn't get to. That doesn't mean they dropped it. That means they didn't make a play on a ball that was put where it should be. 

But you guys are right. We'll just pray to get another QB in 2025 or so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

Dropped or couldn't get to. That doesn't mean they dropped it. That means they didn't make a play on a ball that was put where it should be. 

But you guys are right. We'll just pray to get another QB in 2025 or so. 

So bryce has been putting all his passes where they should be? You sure?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I don't think the ex-NFL LB would have let his Front Office draft a 5'10", 180lb LB.

He knows how likely he is to get injured. 

I don’t think anyone was talking the Tepper’s out of drafting Bryce

The last time the Tepper’s let the coach take a player over the QB they wanted we ended up with Horn over Fields. No chance we traded what we traded without David/Nicole getting the QB they wanted 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

1 in 3 drop backs he has no where to go with the football. My money is on it not being that difficult.

That's not what the poster was saying. He was saying he could find a dozen plus plays where a receiver either dropped a ball or failed to make a play on a well thrown ball. Our receivers aren't doing a good job getting open and our play calling sucks. I don't think anyone would attempt to refute those realities.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...