Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns "liked" this post on Instagram


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Yes he was, he was playing mistake free ball and that's honestly the best of his caeer. 

He finished the season 5 of 15 for 43 yards with 2 INTs. 

that's Sam Darnold after a couple weeks of film.  It always ends the same. 

remember, there were folks claiming Sam was in the MVP race after the first several games with Rhule.  Sam is always Sam.  And all NFL teams need is a handful of weeks to figure out how a team is trying to hide his flaws before they feast on Sam. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

I see what you're saying, but that wasn't as bad as rejecting the trade for multiple firsts. 

It's part of the deal. There were 2 trade offers with Burns as the target. One with the Rams and one as part of the trade with the Bears. Fitterer declined both. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Ship him to the Lions for Jameson Williams and a 1st 

That would be my top trade preference as well, the problem with it is that the Lions are going to have to give Hutch a huge contract next offseason, doubt they want to give up on Williams this quickly, while also giving up another 1st, to then turn around and have 2 of the top 5 paid pass rushers in the league. 

If they didn't have Hutch, I think that's a trade that makes sense for both sides and might have happened, but Hutch and the way he's been playing screws it all up for us.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be shocked to see Burns traded.  They couldn't agree on a deal.  Now it's evident we are going to suck for some time.  I think they slowly start to shift the language to full rebuild.   Which is what we were setup to be doing.   This braintrust  just couldn't tell the difference between up and down. 

but it's Fitt.  Mr. In On Every Deal that is bad for Carolina.   So it will be a bad one.  Probably trades Burns for Chosen Anderson and gives them a 4th on top of it. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WarPanthers89 said:

CMC is looking like a bigger trade blunder, as he would make a massive difference to our offense right now

We had CMC for 5 seasons and made one playoff game (and lost). We all love CMC but he went to an elite team with an elite HC and an elite defense (the past 4 years they have been to a Super Bowl and 3 NFC Championships) and now gets to showcase what he can do. He would have just been another unhappy Barry Sanders. Great player on a poo team.  We did him a solid and got a good return. Now what we did with the return is questionable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, gofightwin said:

We had CMC for 5 seasons and made one playoff game (and lost). We all love CMC but he went to an elite team with an elite HC and an elite defense (the past 4 years they have been to a Super Bowl and 3 NFC Championships) and now gets to showcase what he can do. He would have just been another unhappy Barry Sanders. Great player on a poo team.  We did him a solid and got a good return. Now what we did with the return is questionable. 

We did poo with what we got for him. Jags and a project player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I gave you a full breakdown and examples from last year as to why I think it's unfair to expect 1k from T-Mac this year if everyone stays healthy. But the TLDR version is we will have 4 legitimately good WRs next year, most rookies who get to 1,000 yards don't have any others on the team with them let alone 3 others, it will be hard for him to put up 1k with out the others being injured or falling short of expectations themselves, but in 2026 without Thielen it's different. Because again, I'm not assuming major injuries or games missed when I'm putting expectations out there for the season, I'm assuming good health.  If those other 3 WRs combine to miss a lot of time, then yes, he needs to get to 1k in that scenario.
    • Ulcerative Colitis is not CTE. 
    • Last year Thielen had 615 yards in 10 games (had more ypg than his 1k season in 23).  XL had 497 in 16 games with tons of drops and Coker had 478 in 11. They also only had only 192 of our 518 targets to get those numbers. So if Thielen has 1,000 yards again, XL and Coker each improve to say 600 yards each, and T-Mac comes in at 800 yards, you're going to say that's not good enough?  Especially if he ends up with close to, if not getting to, double digit TD's like I think he will, as he's going to be a red zone monster for Bryce? Because if that's the breakdown of just the Top 4 and Bryce plays all 17 games, he's going to be pushing a 4,000 yard season as the TEs, RBs, and other WRs will probably add up to 750-1k yards as well, and I think that would be far more than anyone here could be expecting of him this season. Last year the Giants only had 2 players with more than 331 yards besides Nabers and they were 699 and 573 while Nabers "only" had 1,200 yards (granted in 15 games).  While the Jags second leading receiving was a TE with 411 yards and BTJ also "only" had 1,282 but in all 17 games. Odunze couldn't get there (734 in 17 games) with Moore and Allen there, just as McConkey was able to get there because his competition for targets was Quentin Johnson (711 yards), Josh Palmer (584), and Will Dissly (481) who I think Thielen, XL, and Coker are all better than any of them. If everyone stays healthy and XL/Coker have improved, I think Bryce is going to spread the ball around rather than focus on T-Mac in a way that most of the 1k rookies have been able to get. Again I point to MHJ and the Cardinals last year. They had 3,859 yards receiving.   McBride had 1,146, MHJ had 885, then their 3rd and 4th in rec yards were 548 and 414. Take the 146 and 85 that McBride/MHJ had over my example for our guys and give them to the other two and they get to 7 yards shy of the 1,200 combined yards I'm using for XL/Coker, while the rest of the team added up to 866 yards. So, if you expect T-Mac to get to 1k, where are you taking those yards from? if anything, XL and Coker each getting 600 yards seems like a low projection, so they wouldn't come from there. Maybe they come from Thielen now that we have T-Mac as the true #1.  But I think if anything, having T-Mac draw attention will just make it easier for Thielen to get open and him and Bryce have great chemistry already, he's not going to stop throwing his way if he can pick up easy chunks of yards there. So maybe they come from the RBs, TEs, other WRs, but it's I think a very fair example to show why expecting 1,000 yards if everyone stays healthy isn't necessarily fair to him. It's also why I said I'd then expect at least 1,200 yards in 2026, as once Thielen leave and all 3 of T-Mac/XL/Coker get better, they absorb that 1,000 yards Thielen leaves behind with T-Mac probably taking close to half of it and the other two splitting up the other half.
×
×
  • Create New...