Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scenario: You’re our GM


WarHeel
 Share

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, Panther53521 said:

I would take anything of good value for any star on defense. Burns, Horn, Chinn, 

draft and free agency look for a NT, speed on WR, MLB

i think we will end 4-13 and Chicago will have a nice pick, but it will not be our pick at number 1

If the NFL had 28 regular-season games instead of 17, this team still wouldn't get a win. It's 0-17 this year and next and then hope a new coach comes in and isn't dogshit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WarHeel said:

It’s evident we have many holes to fill and the ball was dropped in management of trade requests prior to the draft. 
 

To think we could have had Burns for 2 1st rounders and we didn’t jump on it makes me sick to my stomach.


We have no 1st round pick in 2024.

 

We have traded away our two best offensive weapons in Christian and DJ. Currently our best performer is a guy who was really brought in with the intention of a veteran presence and sure hands for short yardage and 3rd down situations.

I’ve seen speculation of different players on the defense that could be traded such as Chinn, Horn, Jackson, but in reality teams are not necessarily going to come knocking for guys that A) have injury history or B) aren’t going to be able to contribute for the next 4-5 weeks.

 

Burns makes the most sense to deal, even now retrospectively. 


That being said, what’s the lowest price you take for Burns?

One first round pick? Two first rounders? Combo of a 1st and higher round pick? Straight up player swap?

 

What is even realistic at this point now that our leverage has taken a huge hit?

 

Will they even trade Burns at this point?

 

Thoughts? 

If I were GM I'd kick David Tepper in the fuging balls, so I'd have some satisfaction and could then work for a franchise worth two shits or become another ESPN NFL "analyst"

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

48 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

If the NFL had 28 regular-season games instead of 17, this team still wouldn't get a win. It's 0-17 this year and next and then hope a new coach comes in and isn't dogshit.

I absolved myself from this place for a week while at the coast...SOS....but you are reality...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, CBDellinger said:

I'd raise the bridge, file down the nut and take the buzz of out the low "E."

 

 

6 hours ago, KSpan said:

I did exactly that to an old G&L bass a few years back. Sounded like a brand-new instrument afterward.

I like me some G&L Guitfiddles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

The rams offer for burns was the worst thing for this fan base. 

Now it's let's get rid of all of our talent and burn the house down, so we can redraft a whole fuging team. 

It was, however, by far the best for the team, and between the record and the failed negotiation this year has shown exactly why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...