Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR Target Efficiency


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Never underestimate the level of fugtardery this leadership group can achieve. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Pretty wild that we brought in these weapons to help get Cam over the hump only to take them away when it's time to get a new franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bryce wasn't worth the trade

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bears would have taken other offers from us if we included DBrown or BBurns. Their top guy was DJ Moore but they were open to others. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...