Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR Target Efficiency


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Never underestimate the level of fugtardery this leadership group can achieve. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, toldozer said:

Man if only we had a reciever like DJ Moore, and perhaps a shifty rb that could catch passes out of the backfield.  Nahhhhhh we got a pg we don't need them (eventhough those are exactly the guys that would thrive with a "pg" type quarterback). Could fat fuging Fitterer and bozo tepper have plans that were any more idiotic 

Pretty wild that we brought in these weapons to help get Cam over the hump only to take them away when it's time to get a new franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bryce wasn't worth the trade

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I know you guys love to complain about the situation but please don't have revisionist history. It has been public knowledge that without Moore we don't get Bryce. It's how the Bears GM said he wanted it to go down. If Moore was not on the table it would have have been done. There's no point in complaining about Moore or act like we could have had Bryce and Moore. It was never going to happen. Sucks this is the dimension we live in but what is done is done guys.

Bears would have taken other offers from us if we included DBrown or BBurns. Their top guy was DJ Moore but they were open to others. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...