Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich doesn’t think there is any chance Burns plays Thursday


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Wait we don't need Burns no big deal right huddle fam?

I mean, it might not be the best matchup to highlight your point.  I mean this would be the  type matchup our D should be able to handle not having him if you had to pick a game. 

Bears are a top 5 rushing O

We are one of the top 5 worst defenses against the run.  

gameplan on a short week for Chicago should be simple.  Run, run, run. 


 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, it might not be the best matchup to highlight your point.  I mean this would be the  type matchup our D should be able to handle not having him if you had to pick a game. 

Bears are a top 5 rushing O

We are one of the top 5 worst defenses against the run.  

gameplan on a short week for Chicago should be simple.  Run, run, run. 


 

Foreman will get 150

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We're 1-7. It doesn't matter. The only thing we're playing for right now is trying to avoid the shame of sending the #1 overall pick to Chicago after trading a haul to get the #1 overall pick.

I don't get this. Who cares if Chicago ends up with the #1 pick? We're not going to get it regardless.

Why does it matter if it's #1 or #5? We suck either way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

I don't get this. Who cares if Chicago ends up with the #1 pick? We're not going to get it regardless.

Why does it matter if it's #1 or #5? We suck either way.

You don't think it would be ultra embarrassing to send a haul to Chicago for the #1 overall pick to then turn around and have part of that haul be a #1 overall pick in return?

Hell, we still talk about sending the pick that would turn into #33 overall to NE Armanti Edwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't think it would be ultra embarrassing to send a haul to Chicago for the #1 overall pick to then turn around and have part of that haul be a #1 overall pick in return?

Hell, we still talk about sending the pick that would turn into #33 overall to NE Armanti Edwards.

It would be embarrassing for people who hang out on message boards and Panthers Twitter. Otherwise, what difference does it actually make in terms of the future of the team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's short sighted to judge a QB or HC in a vacuum. They both need good players to be successful. That's the GM's role. And he's young in his role too. His general experience in the league gives him a bit of an advantage/perspective that everyone doesn't have. But he still has to perfect his role as a GM.  But whether they're good or not, they are young in their roles. That is the point I was making. Could they be better at what they do? Of course. But it's hard to have early success when you have so many major areas still figuring out how to do their jobs at the same time. Asking a QB to pass for 4000 yards when neither of his 2 best WRs have played a full season is a tall task. Asking a HC to be an effective HC while he's calling plays when he's only done it for 3 years, and he has a young roster is a tall ask. Especially with a roster with so many holes and lack of talent. But that young label is definitely coming to its end. It's about time to start showing major improvements on offense, defense and coaching. Dan has had 3 drafts/offseasons to improve the roster. Dave has had 2 training camps. Bryce has had 3 seasons, though that first season was a pretty tough situation for anyone to learn, let alone have success. The QB is on the hotseat. Mostly because it's pay up or shut up time. He's ran out of time. Doesn't matter if he has reasons or not.  Not getting into the other stuff. Too many layers to pull back.   
    • Id love to see Dave Canales lay the wood hard on a guy
×
×
  • Create New...