Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Please be patient


Gipetto
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Here's the thing though. All those other guys went to the worst team in the league. A team that earned the #1 overall pick. We traded up from #9. And we gave up a LOT.

These things are not the same.

If it makes you feel any better, we are definitely the worst team in the league rn 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

133 passing yards, you can't tell me there were plays he could have stepped up and threw up at least some 50/50 balls. fug it at this point, go yolo

I don’t disagree with you however with this WR group we are not getting 50/50 lol maybe 20/80 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sir look at this roster now look at the coaches.

 

Nothing to be patient about respectfully.

I’m holding out for a Jag situation. Terrible coach with a bad roster year 1, found the right head coach year 2 + went a overspent in FA to help out their QB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, La Flama Blanca said:

You’re obviously not watching the games or have no sense of football. The guy is playing pretty damn well for the most part. We’re just not good right now,  the tide will turn eventually 

Taking nearly the whole game to eclipse 100 passing yards and scoring exactly zero touchdowns against the Bears is playing pretty damn well?

He had a couple nice throws but for the most part he was the same as he's been all along. He just does not look like he's going to be able to beat any teams in this league with his arm. That's the ugly truth we're left to face right now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just blow it all up. It’s a complete failure on offense. Young will have his chance to show something in 2024 if he can’t then we move on from him too. This offense has been absolutely pathetic all around. I mean who would anyone want to retain or build around on offense right now? Wilks at least knew how to scheme to his players strengths. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, emhoward said:

Well unlike Bridgewater and Darnold, Bryce is, for the most part, going to be our QB for the next 3 years no matter what. Might as well believe until you can't, he ain't going nowhere.

So you would rather be delusional than to face the fact that the Panthers picked a scrub #1 overall? 

I say that accepting the fact that BY isn't an NFL quarterback now is better than 3 years from now. A good team can be built in 3 seasons, just not around a scrub QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Here's the thing though. All those other guys went to the worst team in the league. A team that earned the #1 overall pick. We traded up from #9. And we gave up a LOT.

These things are not the same.

We also got rid of our two best offensive players, last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give him 2024 with a new staff.  However, I think the lesson learned is that physical limitations don't go away because of other intangible qualities.  They remain, and will be exacerbated with better competition. 

You need to craft something that suits them in order to succeed.  Unfortunately Bryce isn't a guy that can be dropped into a system.  He's someone who needs to be built around, a highly curated environment.  And they haven't built, rather dropped him into a Reich offense.  

Seems like we have a staff who aren't the nuts and bolts coaches running an offense in a mechanical fashion.  Evero seems to be the closest thing.  Brown is looking like he should've stuck with the Shanahan tree.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...