Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Daniel Jeremiah on Panthers Offense/Bryce

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

BrisbanePanther Mentor

BrisbanePanther

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, ncfan said:

No.  There was another guy who was circulating around in the media who said Texans would’ve taken Bryce over Stroud if they had the chance

Herbstreit did go to OSU though--I think his kid still plays there now and played with Stroud last year. He called a lot of OSU games on ABC and he gushed over Stroud too. IMO, he'd be closer to Stroud than any other talking head, so if he's not ready to bury Bryce yet since his guy is setting the world on fire, maybe it's a perspective to bear in mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Clearly. I mean its not like any of them ever admit they were wrong anyway. 

Reason why i dont know what posting there opinions is supposed to prove. 

They already did the draft noise now it's 'how do they fix this' noise because they know there is absolutely a year 2 in this situation. Blah blah blah.

Good to hear that it now sure looks like everyone including Bryce narrative vs everyone else but that still doesn't solve the unwatchable football. 

Edited by Waldo
Link to comment
Share on other sites
recceice Proficient

recceice

Posted
Posted
On 11/14/2023 at 3:38 PM, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I mean, they're saying the window IS there but it's very small and in a very short amount of time. This ain't college. You're playing against PROS. Yes, an elite WR will give you better windows but Young's numbers could be better if he got it to these scrubs sooner. Could.

These guys aren’t catching wide open passes none of them (except Thelien) gets pro open.. And making contested catches in Charlotte seem illegal this year..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
96Bravo Proficient

96Bravo

Posted
Posted
On 11/15/2023 at 6:32 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Video discussion...

Burns for Pitts would be highly unlikely, but that'd certainly generate a lot of discussion.

Gee, I don't know. What if you trade Burns for Pitt and find out Bryce WAS the problem all along? Not saying he is, but that's quite a gamble. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stratocatter Mentor

stratocatter

Posted
Posted
On 11/15/2023 at 1:48 PM, Waldo said:

They already did the draft noise now it's 'how do they fix this' noise because they know there is absolutely a year 2 in this situation. Blah blah blah.

Good to hear that it now sure looks like everyone including Bryce narrative vs everyone else but that still doesn't solve the unwatchable football. 

Year 2, man. That's gonna be tough.  We'd be lucky at just 2 years of anything on offense but it will be more because of what they are not willing to admit they have wasted.

It is going to be so much worse if they sell out the defense to bolster those already squandered assets. Which is something people are proposing already. 

Defense has been the best part of the team. They want that too. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
On 11/14/2023 at 8:48 PM, Jay Roosevelt said:

They're not just unafraid of being beat deep, they're not afraid of our receivers being able to do anything after the catch either.

Between the OL being forced into a zone blocking scheme that they're just not suited for and trying to run a quick strike passing game with slow possession receivers we're pretty well fuged.

I'll admit Bryce can certainly play a lot better, but this is a situation that would be tough for any QB to perform in.

To me the Key to all our offensive Woos.   It's irritating that we are supposed to have all these great offensive minds, yet they can't seem to get out of their own way to go with what suits the players you have. I've said it 100 times.  I don't see how the "strength" of our team last year was the offensive line and this year they look like a terrible college line.  

I watch game after game, college and Pros and see so many innovative things being done yet we're luck if we see one innovative play per game.

There is no perfect scheme defensively.  Great offensive minds find a way to crack a defense.  Where the F are these minds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AceBoogie said:

Have we had a game this year where the full offense was healthy? I don’t think there’s been a single game where 1-2 players haven’t been out. 

Christensen went down after week 1. Others were already out before.

Don't think Sanders has been fully healthy in any game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...