Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Frank back to calling plays


DJ feed me moore
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

It was a good game by Dalton, but I mean his average YPA was meh (just like Young's).  We put up 27 points which is our highest but Young put up 24 and 21 his last two games before Brown took over play calling in half the amount of attempts.  I get that points are points but you are talking about a 3 point swing from Young's best game.  I'd rather keep letting the rookie get reps to see if he can get better or not.  A couple extra wins with Dalton doesn't do much for us.  Plus Dalton had some good games last year with NO and some stinkers.  It's kind of where he is at now in his career.

You seriously throwing Minnesota and Miami in there acting like Bryce was the reason we scored those points? Bryce had like half a good quarter because the Miami defense was asleep (not to mention the run game was actually effective for once and forced the defense to have to be wary of it) and then did nothing the rest of the game. In the Vikings game, we had a pick 6 that was over half of the points we scored in the game + Bryce had a terrible fumble that gave the Vikings a TD. The defense (14) almost outscored the offense (20) in those 2 games. I promise you if Bryce was starting @ Seattle, we lose that game by easily 3+ TDs (and honestly probably by like 30) with how awful the defense was in the game.

Meanwhile, Dalton threw for almost 400 yards (without Corbett even being healthy) with Andy Dalton almost being our leading rusher that game and our defense giving up what felt like a billion yards. If the Seattle RZ offense weren't poo that game, we are talking about them scoring 50 to 60 points against us...

I don't see how Dalton's game is anything like the Vikings and Dolphins game, outside of our defense actually scoring points for us... 

If you want to keep giving Bryce reps because we feel like that will somehow magically make him better in the future, fine. Saying there was only a small drop off in offense between Bryce's last 2 games with Reice calling plays and Dalton's is just beyond stupid...

 

Edit:  And I mixed up the Vikings game with the Lions game. We literally had 7 points against the Detroit starters and were getting beat so badly they had their 3rd string in by the 4th Q... So sure, if we are proud of Bryce beating up on a 3rd string defense and getting 14 points in the 4th, I guess we should be happy

Edited by PleaseCutStewart
Link to comment
Share on other sites

at this point this is just rearranging furniture on the Titanic

 

I hope and pray Dallas curb stomps us 77-3 and we are a total joke on TV and the stadium is all Cowboys fans. Maybe then Mr. Hedgefund and his Head Scout will see how colossal of a fug up this is and clean house and hire a president of football

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheBigKat said:

at this point this is just rearranging furniture on the Titanic

 

I hope and pray Dallas curb stomps us 77-3 and we are a total joke on TV and the stadium is all Cowboys fans. Maybe then Mr. Hedgefund and his Head Scout will see how colossal of a fug up this is and clean house and hire a president of football

Doubt he cares. Teppe is a giant cuck and honesly it wouldn't surprise me if he enjoys being humiliated like that

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

You seriously throwing Minnesota and Miami in there acting like Bryce was the reason we scored those points? Bryce had like half a good quarter because the Miami defense was asleep (not to mention the run game was actually effective for once and forced the defense to have to be wary of it) and then did nothing the rest of the game. In the Vikings game, we had a pick 6 that was over half of the points we scored in the game + Bryce had a terrible fumble that gave the Vikings a TD. The defense (14) almost outscored the offense (20) in those 2 games. I promise you if Bryce was starting @ Seattle, we lose that game by easily 3+ TDs (and honestly probably by like 30) with how awful the defense was in the game.

Meanwhile, Dalton threw for almost 400 yards (without Corbett even being healthy) with Andy Dalton almost being our leading rusher that game and our defense giving up what felt like a billion yards. If the Seattle RZ offense weren't poo that game, we are talking about them scoring 50 to 60 points against us...

I don't see how Dalton's game is anything like the Vikings and Dolphins game, outside of our defense actually scoring points for us... 

If you want to keep giving Bryce reps because we feel like that will somehow magically make him better in the future, fine. Saying there was only a small drop off in offense between Bryce's last 2 games with Reice calling plays and Dalton's is just beyond stupid...

 

Edit:  And I mixed up the Vikings game with the Lions game. We literally had 7 points against the Detroit starters and were getting beat so badly they had their 3rd string in by the 4th Q... So sure, if we are proud of Bryce beating up on a 3rd string defense and getting 14 points in the 4th, I guess we should be happy

So if Bryce averages 6.2 YPA, is that pretty good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, thennek said:

Perhaps Frank is protecting Brown by doing this. 

 

5 minutes ago, Dorian Gray said:

I actually thought that too. Could be falling on the sword knowing Sunday is gonna be a bloodbath.

Not sure, though I've said before I think it's possible Brown wasn't ready to be an OC yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm talking about the overall passing attack looking a lot more viable.l, not specific stats. Though the specific stats I'd point to for leading to the overall passing attack looking a lot more viable is that we actually threw the ball downfield with some success.

We were too one dimensional (probably because Seattle's secondary was banged up) to sustain any kind of success.  Throwing the ball 58 times for 27 points and a loss isn't ideal for any team much less a QB that is over the hill...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Yeah, but it lets us know if it is more of a Bryce problem as to why we only have 1 win or if it truly is 100% on the Oline and receivers. If Dalton were to play the rest of the year and go 3-5 or 4-4, I think that speaks to it being more of a Bryce problem

Which is the reason why brycels dont want Dalton anywhere near the field. If dalton outperforms again it will be that much harder to defend him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most Huddlers have contacted me via Twitter, Zoom conference, PM, email, and in one case, a telegram delivered by the Pony Express (Mr. Scot) and asked me, "MHS, what are we going to do about the OL?  We already have the highest payroll and we are about to either pay Ekwonu for a fifth year or a lucrative, long-term contract.  Is this sustainable?"  "Nope." So I done some thinking, I did. I looked at contracts (OTC) and performance (PFF--the best available rating system, albeit flawed--let's move on) and age of the players.   A source called "AI" (yes, TheSpecialJuan, the same people who make the steak sauce) says this: Peak performance by position   Tackles: Peak performance can last longer for tackles, with top-tier players often peaking around age 34.   Centers and Guards: Peak performance for centers and guards generally occurs earlier, with peak years often ending between 29 and 32 years old.  So with that in mind, I offer you something called "Research" (literally, it means "to look for it again.") Enjoy GUARD Robert Hunt.  He is 29 right now and under contract for another 3 seasons. However, paying a G in his 30s $24m per season is crazy.  Something has to give.  We get no cap help by cutting him after this season unless he is a Post June 1 cut, then we throw $15m on the dead cap and save $9m.  Not worth it.  However, after the 2026 season, the post-June 1 savings go up to $19m. It is $13m if he is cut pre-June 1.  Hunt will be 31 (not that old for a G), but we would be smart to use that $$ elsewhere.  I think we need to plan on having Hunt on this team through 2026, unless he restructures, something I do not think serves the best long-term interests of the Panthers. Damien Lewis.  (28) Less money, but nearly the same situation.  If he becomes a post-June 1 cut after the 2026 season, we would save $19m.  One could argue that both Lewis and Hunt could be on the roster through 2027, and a lot depends on the QB situation.  Still, if I am GM, I take a look at the current situation at Guard.  Lewis has 3-4 good years left and has been very solid.  With only half his contract guaranteed, it makes sense to extend Lewis and cut Hunt. Jake Curhan…If you have been paying attention, he has been solid. In the long-term plans, this could be a lot more significant than it seems right now. Over the past few weeks, T Jake Curhan has been solid at RG.  He is 27.  I lock him down with a 4-year deal in the $8m-10m per range and make him my backup in 2026 (at 28) and starter in 2027 (at 29).       Guard Prognosis: Sign Curhan to a long-term deal, based on his performance at RG.  Extend Lewis for 2 years, keeping him as the RG  through 2029.  Trade Hunt now or release him after the 2026 season. Zavala is under contract through 2026 on a very team-friendly deal. He was better in 2024, fwiw, but those 2025 numbers are terrible.  Not sure we need a G in 2026 draft, unless we trade Hunt. (good luck with that).   CENTER Cade Mays. (26) Mays is entering his prime as an OL and he has played several interior OL positions, making his contributions valuable.  He is probably average to slightly below average as a center, but he needs a contract.  An ideal IOL backup, he still has upside and is not a liability at center.  He needs to improve on his run blocking, but for a center, that has a lot to do with his abilities to recognize stunts and call blocking assignments–understandable.  Pass blocking is good, fwiw.  He needs a 4-year deal to keep him on the roster, and signing him now might be wise.  Nick Samac (24).  It is noteworthy that the Panthers pulled up center Nick Samac (24) from the Ravens’ practice squad, who the Ravens were fairly high on, so maybe center is not as big a need as we think. I still think we should draft or sign a C at some point with the mindset of moving Cade Mays to a reserve IOL.   Austin Corbett (30)  meanwhile, the oft-injured G converted to center, is making $10m this season and 2026 is a voidable year.  He is probably gone.  He is having a better year than Mays in spot duty, but last season, Mays actually outperformed Corbett using the PFF data.     Center Prognosis:  Sign Mays to a long-term, reasonable contract (backup rate with starting incentives), allow Samac to compete for the job/backup job (I have no idea how good he is).  Draft a center in 2026.  Say “bye-bye” to IR Corbett.   TACKLE Icky Ekwonu (25) will see his salary double to about $17m in 2026, but I expect him to be re-signed to a long-term deal through the 2030 season.  If I am Morgan and I am not extending Young, I make that deal front-loaded Taylor Moton (31) has been solid, and his salary for 2026 ($21m) means that he will be our RT next season.  He is likely to be in Carolina through 2027, when he turns 33, but the salary will be $28m, with half guaranteed.  He has a low, voidable year in 2028 (age 34) at a reasonable $6m.   Brady Christensen (29).  Listed as a G, he is (to me) the epitome of a swing OT with the ability to backup OG, lowering the need to draft a G. He needs a deal, however, and if I am the Panthers, I give him a 3-year deal because his depth is valuable and he is playing well. Yosh Nijman (29). Nope. A pass pro grade of 46.7 gets your QB blue tented.  His contract expires at the end of the 2025 season.  We need to draft Moton’s future replacement and possible backup.  Let BC play behind Icky and provide G depth.  Time to groom the next RT.   Tackle Prognosis:  Give Ickey the deal he deserves (ouch) and lock him down.  Count on Moton being your RT for 2026 and probably 2027.  Re-sign BC and let him play swing T and provide G depth.  Draft a RT in the 2026 draft.    OVERALL:  The OL needs to manage the cap to sustain future growth, so the priority needs to be re-signing Curhan and planning for the Hunt departure. Re-sign Brady Christensen and Cade Mays to contracts of 3 years or so. Extend Lewis.  Lock Ickey down. Draft or sign a RT and C. Let Corbett and Nijman walk.  Lewis needs to restructure and Hunt needs to be gone before 2027. We lose the $10m Corbett salary and Nijman’s $3m, but Ickey’s salary goes up about $10m (5th year–unless he is signed to a long-term deal that absorbs some of that cost).  Lewis should be extended to save some cap room in 2026, but that $$ would go to the BC and Mays contracts. Curhan needs a deal because we need a proven commodity to replace Hunt down the road.  So the cap might increase for the OL in 2026 a bit, facilitating the Hunt release in 2027, which saves nearly $20m.  Of course, locking down Ickey now could make the 2026 cap more manageable.  With liabilities Corbett and Nijman gone (and the $13m they were paid), we can re-sign BC and Mays.  Lewis’ restructure could cover the first year of the Ickey deal and maybe Curhan will not be too expensive to re-sign.  If we could do this, our OL depth would be better and our future would be cheaper and brighter.   Urgency for 2026:   Tackle:  Low if we re-sign BC and draft a RT to develop behind Moton.   Guard: Low if we still have Hunt, Lewis, Curhan, and Zavala for 2026. Center: Medium urgency in that Mays has been decent and is entering his prime.  What do we have behind him?  Competition and depth needed.  (NOTE:  I think the depth positions need to be filled in the draft because we can't afford free agents in 2026.)
    • Isaiah Simmons is absolutely horrible. His change of direction is poor, but the most disturbing part about him is how physically weak he is for his size. He can get stiff armed by WRs and knocked to the turf.  Simmons will play OLB for us due to his height which can help in pass coverage. Keep in mind that he's terrible. 
    • Has he fumbled on a carry or is it just returns?
×
×
  • Create New...