Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I legit feel bad for Bryce


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 11/28/2023 at 2:53 PM, rebelrouser said:

Can you blame him with this line? This franchise might ruin a decent qb prospect. I bet Bryce would be doing well on the Texans. Whether even CJ could succeed here is up in the air. 

Saying Cj who is setting records on a 3 win team last year would struggle here in the same way on a team that won 7 is already funny. But saying bryce would be doing well on the texans is just pure comedy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

A bunch of y'all didn't feel bad for Corral. How about Penix at the top of the 2nd? BY not making this throw

 

I like Penix but he is older with some great weapons around him. He didn’t play like this at Indiana just like Bo Nix didn’t at Auburn. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

A bunch of y'all didn't feel bad for Corral. How about Penix at the top of the 2nd? BY not making this throw

 

Pretty sure he made a similar pass to Thielen after spinning out of a sack but it was to the opposite side of the field. Grasping at straws trying to find anything to throw shade on our QB. I think it's time for some of yall to finally go root for a new team because garbage takes like this are getting really really old.

https://youtube.com/shorts/uZOESVlpNdk?si=ksAtrj9iz9itpAi1

Only difference is the college WR actually had separation for his QB to throw the ball. Thielen had 0 separation and Bryce still threw a dot. Similar route both are running to the corner pylon Penix had about 37 air yards compared to Bryce's 35.

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Saying Cj who is setting records on a 3 win team last year would struggle here in the same way on a team that won 7 is already funny. But saying bryce would be doing well on the texans is just pure comedy. 

Thinking teams remain the same from year to year and thinking prior year records are some sort of indictment on the current year is actually the comedy part. It just shows you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to this sport. Every team starts completely over in the offseason. Especially teams that change their entire coaching staff. The personnel change, the players change. Injuries. There are so many different factors that weigh on a team from year to year. Look at the 2015 Panthers. They went 15-1 to 6-10 the following year. First team in NFL History to go 15-1 and miss the playoffs the following year. What's your explanation for that? By your logic they should have went undefeated or at the very least secured double digit wins. Would love to hear an explanation

Edited by Mr Mojo Risin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Saying Cj who is setting records on a 3 win team last year would struggle here in the same way on a team that won 7 is already funny. But saying bryce would be doing well on the texans is just pure comedy. 

It might come as a shock to you but both teams are completely different from last season. Last season means absolute nothing when comparing the two situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think multiple things can be true. Stroud should have been the pick. He’s a better NFL QB. 
 

Bryce isn’t THE problem on offense. 
 

Bryce is absolutely one of the problems with the offense. 
 

Fitterer has been absolutely trash in the draft so why do we feel like the guy who assembled one of the worst rosters in the NFL got the Bryce pick right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Pretty sure he made a similar pass to Thielen after spinning out of a sack but it was to the opposite side of the field. Grasping at straws trying to find anything to throw shade on our QB. I think it's time for some of yall to finally go root for a new team because garbage takes like this are getting really really old.

https://youtube.com/shorts/uZOESVlpNdk?si=ksAtrj9iz9itpAi1

Only difference is the college WR actually had separation for his QB to throw the ball. Thielen had 0 separation and Bryce still threw a dot. Similar route both are running to the corner pylon Penix had about 37 air yards compared to Bryce's 35.

This team is the Carolina Panthers, not the Carolina Bryce Youngs. I hope he succeeds but I’m not going to pretend like what I’ve seen is good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

Pretty sure he made a similar pass to Thielen after spinning out of a sack but it was to the opposite side of the field. Grasping at straws trying to find anything to throw shade on our QB. I think it's time for some of yall to finally go root for a new team because garbage takes like this are getting really really old.

https://youtube.com/shorts/uZOESVlpNdk?si=ksAtrj9iz9itpAi1

Only difference is the college WR actually had separation for his QB to throw the ball. Thielen had 0 separation and Bryce still threw a dot. Similar route both are running to the corner pylon Penix had about 37 air yards compared to Bryce's 35.

Not comparable at all. Bryce chucked a very interceptable heave that to the inside of the field that went about 35 yards and that Thielen was luckily able to catch. Penix made a read and dropped a touch pass over the outside shoulder where only his receiver could get it, and the ball travelled 40-ish air yards accounting for the cross-field distance from left hash to catch. Bryce was also moving to his left and Penix was stationary.

Also, Thielen has a good 1.5 yards or more of separation coming across the field. Bryce just threw a poorly-placed ball that required him to slow down and adjust.

What does it all mean? Who knows, beyond a direct comparison of the two plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...