Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Nicole Tepper


Pazhoosier89
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't believe either of the Teppers are actually making deals or closing transactions directly or anything of that sort.

With Dave though, I think he expresses preferences over players he wants, players he doesn't care for, how he wants things done, etc.

That's really all the meddling he or any owner has to do to royally screw things up.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

you people are getting trolled.

The chance of actually making the decisions on her own is somewhere close to zero, let alone being the GM.

Just because she makes the phone call to trade up for a player doesn't mean she is making the decisions.  Do you honestly think that was her idea?  

That was a player that the front office and coaches wanted, she did the formality of making the call.  No different if you tell a staffer to make the call.

 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jay Roosevelt said:

Way too many conspiracy theories on here about Nicole Tepper. I seriously doubt she has as much influence as people seem to think.

In other words, David Tepper doesn't need any help to be a terrible owner. If we are keeping Scott Fitterer it's because he's Dave's rubber stamp/proxy, not Nicole's.

why is she watching practice (by herself)?  Why is she interviewing coaching candidates?  Why is she at pro days and interviewing potential prospects?

 

add it all together and you have to assume she is giving some level of input which is crazy

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

you people are getting trolled.

The chance of actually making the decisions on her own is somewhere close to zero, let alone being the GM.

Just because she makes the phone call to trade up for a player doesn't mean she is making the decisions.  Do you honestly think that was her idea?  

That was a player that the front office and coaches wanted, she did the formality of making the call.  No different if you tell a staffer to make the call.

 

 

 

to be fair you were the same dude arguing recently that Tepper isnt a meddling owner so theres that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely no way in hell that this conspiracy is true.

It would have been leaked to the media by now.

Your sins will always find you out… Connor Stalions at Michigan, the Chicago Blackhawks covering up sexual assaults, etc.

If something this big we’re true then it would have been leaked by now.

I’m all for dragging the Tepper’s but this one is insane.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You joke, but it can always be worse. He might walk with a limp or need assistance. Different sport, but Lonzo Ball couldn't even walk up steps a year after his injury.
    • I mean... a lot of the information that could've helped set better expectations has always been out there: There was no RB on the team under contract for the 2025 - 2026 season except for Miles Sanders. The team did not have a second round pick going into the 2025 season due to the trade for Young. Chuba's extension did not happen until the beginning of November. Jonathon Brooks was the clear RB1 in the class with a massive gap between RB1 & RB2. Example: Dane Brugler had Brooks as RB1, overall #48; Blake Corum was RB2, #81 overall. The Giants held pick #47 and had just lost Saquon Barkley to the Eagles in free agency. They were going to take Brooks had the Panthers not jumped in front of them. So if we're framing things with that context: Chuba was expected to be RB1 Miles (at the time) was RB2 Brooks was essentially RB3, stashed for rehab in 2024 with a long runway. The original injury occurred Nov 2023 while the re-injury occurred December 2024. That is right in the high-risk window for recurrence, especially in explosive athletes. The fact that it also happened on a non-contact play suggests possible biomechanical issues such as muscle imbalance, rather than a failed surgery (or bad decision-making).   NFL teams invest heavily in medically vetting prospects. If there had been a clear red flag in imaging or recovery markers, the team is going to find it. This sucks and the Panthers have sucked, yes, but this wasn't blind optimism or malpractice by the front office. It was a calculated decision based on the roster, draft capital, positional scarcity, etc.
    • Yep, but they can all rotate with Brown, Brown and Robinson (sounds like a law firm). Can't continue to have Derrick Brown out there for 90+ percent of the defensive snaps. An injury was bound to happen. 
×
×
  • Create New...