Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New team president


catnip
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, PanthersGTI said:

I  am down with Olsen as HC, but I can't see Cam as President. Some other role where he is allowed to bring some attitude and culture to the team would be great though. Like just have him around the team year round and let his influence spread through the building. Cam put in the time and refused to lose, it wasn't in his mindset. We need that. 

Olsen for team president.  Dave may actually listen to Greg. Greg also has many connections across the league and is well respected among his peers. I could get behind that.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the input .  I don't post often but Cam just has a certain flair about him .  Love him or hate him I got the feeling most would be fine with him in some role as a Panther . Maybe not team president but something else ,  We need something to give us some hope .   Cam with always be a Panther and what better way than to bring him back as a spokesman and represent what we are as a team .   Thanks for posting ! Keep pounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

The nostalgia to have former players like Newton and Olsen come back and save us is fun and all, but...no.

There are a million things that a team president does that have nothing to do with football. That's why it's the kind of thing you ideally work your way up to.

Either of them is infinitely more qualified than Nicole is for her position, so fug it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, mc52beast said:

I don’t understand why people can’t just let go of Cam. He was awesome on the field, would be absolutely clueless in a front office position.

And you know this how? Y'all need to calm down. Cam is a successful business man. I'm not saying that he would be successful, but he isn't, and wouldn't be, "clueless" by any stretch of the imagination. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2023 at 11:37 AM, Selltheteamtepper said:

Aren’t we stuck with Jonathan Mingo, a WR with a 3rd round grade we took at the top of the 2nd, for 4 years bc the FO listened to former players on who they preferred? Steve Smith took credit for that selection IIRC

Where did you hear that Steve Smith was either directly or indirectly responsible for the Mingo pick? I know that he liked the pick, and that he gave Mingo his stamp of approval on his podcast, but I've not heard that anyone actually solicited his advice before directly making the pick. 

Moreover, the fact is that the story of Mingo has only just begun. Why you guys would give up on Mingo so soon is a product of simply wanting to be overly negative because of the geneal mismanagement of the offense. 

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...