Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Keeping Chris Tabor around in some capacity

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, Steelo said:

There are no such things as tepper guys. Especially when they had no prior relationship to him.  That "Tepper guy" thing is massively overblown.  IF a new HC wants to keep Tabor I'd be all for it, he knows what he is doing.  He doesn't have HC aspirations and wants to be good at his craft.  Especially when you hire a first time HC.  Tabor might be the easiest hire/retention he makes.  We need an offensive overhaul, Defense and ST have been playing decently well.  Yeah I'd argue that we should be going after kicking competition, but other than that Tabor has been making solid ST players out of fringe roster guys.

Maybe there are no “Tepper” guys, fair enough.

Humor me. Make sure of it by getting rid of any “me” type of self preservationists.

Yeah, 1st one to go. Too bad. Each of those people's  is a talented coach, but you can’t have that tattletale culture.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, Waldo said:

He would be the first pink slip for a new HC and GM. Just clean house and try again. Forcing any of the current people on the new staff would be a huge fail because they are supposed to be running the show and not more of the usual mess.

Eh, Evero needs to stick around. He actually started turning Rhule/Snows poo defense in the right direction.  I think with some good drafts and better FA moves he could put a real defensive machine on the field next year… as much as I hate 3-4.

Every other coaching spot I agree should be cleaned out and new HC gets his guys. Of course that’s if Evero is even willing to stay. 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Eh, Evero needs to stick around. He actually started turning Rhule/Snows poo defense in the right direction.  I think with some good drafts and better FA moves he could put a real defensive machine on the field next year… as much as I hate 3-4.

Every other coaching spot I agree should be cleaned out and new HC gets his guys. Of course that’s if Evero is even willing to stay. 

He seems like a good coach and I haven't heard anything about him being apart of the coaching drama going on in that house. Still it is so bad here that a fresh start would be welcomed. Maybe the new crew has some connections to him or could mesh well with what they want to do and how they want to do it. But that seems like a lot and this last crew had too many issues with that very thing, too little meshing and a lot of friction from it. Add in Tepper's management flaws and the tighter the crew the better because this time is an absolute mess. 

I'm fine with the 3-4...once they are done trying to build the D around Burns. Solid player but not that kind of player. The 49ers 4-3 would be fun but not the BS attempt they tried last year, Burns should have been on the weakside and they just didn't have that stud 4-3 end on the strong side because that isn't Bruns. 

I have no idea what Evero wants or would do. I do know there are more DCs out there to be had vs the offensive side where they are getting picked up sooner and sooner due to the limited availability of talent. Hell if McDermott becomes available I would love him as a DC, even if for a short time. Maybe Evero gets a shot as a HC this hiring cycle. Just handle it right and if he becomes available down the road don't have a burnt bridge between them is all I am really asking for from that process. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
Posted

I think there is a chance that Tepper might want to keep Tabor around for at least next season as head coach.  

Reasons being:

 

- He should be firing Fitterer.  That means a new gm who should have a huge say in who the new head coach is going to be.  After finding a new gm it is going to be late in the game to find any decent head coach candidates who haven't already committed to another team.

- Also- it is going to be a very difficult sell to find a head coach who is going to be willing to have Bryce Young forced on them as a starting qb for at least one more year.

- There are a LOT of head coach positions that are going to be open this year.  The Panthers are one of the least desirable places to go

- we have very little draft capital for a new coach/gm combo to use this year to upgrade our team- less incentive for a decent head coach candidate to want to come here- better to wait till 2025 and see if young is a bust for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steelo Proficient

Steelo

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, strato said:

Maybe there are no “Tepper” guys, fair enough.

Humor me. Make sure of it by getting rid of any “me” type of self preservationists.

Yeah, 1st one to go. Too bad. Each of those people's  is a talented coach, but you can’t have that tattletale culture.

Humor me, by pointing out which staff members were "Snitching".. is it just anyone that wasn't fired a snitch? Capers, Caldwell..? I mean I get we're down bad on Mint St but logic has flown out the window with the fanbase as well. How do we know the 2 that got axed by Tabor weren't the ones running behind Frank's back and talking bad about the franchise.  I mean at this point everyone probably believes Tepper was on Epstein's list and because Schefter refuted it that he's also a Tepper guy? Get a grip.  He's a good ST coach, it's likely another HC especially a new one with little connections so far would actually retain him.  I have no issue with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...