Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the wide receivers magically get good?


RumHam
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RumHam said:

Or were they never the problem to begin? They werent. Its been the play calling and Bryce's decision making. Kudos to the best offensive game all year and the only game worth watching. Then the defense decided to not show up. We got hosed. We should keep this staff for one more year.

Nah this ain’t it. We never used pre snap motion with Reich. As of now, Chark is the only dude who had the speed to get separation under the old scheme and for whatever reason he was not. T Brown’s offense is light years better, the pre snap motion today and scheming open guys was so satisfying. The WRs def were a problem, it just wasn’t their fault. They were being asked to do something they couldn’t (outside of Chark) 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, frankw said:

Fair or not at the end of the day the offense goes as the QB goes. Bryce was dialed in and that translated to rest of the offense.

As bad as people are saying GB's defense is. The Bucs are somehow worse. No reason we can't replicate this performance next week. Against Baker Mayfield too? Cmon...

Speaking of Baker just had a perfect passer ratings against the Packers last week. 381 yards and 4 td's. Bryce had a good game but he's gonna have to do it again against Tampa. Also since we've already played them once it'll be easier to get an idea of what changes have or haven't benefited the offense since the first game. On another note Tabor seems like he's possibly the best in game manager we've had in recent memory though lol. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Speaking of Baker just had a perfect passer ratings against the Packers last week. 381 yards and 4 td's. Bryce had a good game but he's gonna have to do it again against Tampa. Also since we've already played them once it'll be easier to get an idea of what changes have or haven't benefited the offense since the first game. On another note Tabor seems like he's possibly the best in game manager we've had in recent memory though lol. 

Tabor was fired up and got in the refs ear a few times that game. Haven't seen that from a Panthers HC in a long long time.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frankw said:

Fair or not at the end of the day the offense goes as the QB goes. Bryce was dialed in and that translated to rest of the offense.

As bad as people are saying GB's defense is. The Bucs are somehow worse. No reason we can't replicate this performance next week. Against Baker Mayfield too? Cmon...

Oh youre dreaming

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Bryce was making some tight window throws and the packers D is garbage 

Gave up 500 yds last week to baker and made a giants backup qb look like tom brady but hey dont mention how bad the defenses are... you can only do that with andy dalton and other qbs. 

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Gave up 500 yds last week to baker and made a giants backup qb look like tom brady but hey dont mention how bad the defenses are... you can only do that with andy dalton and other qbs. 

Indy was a bad defense so was Tennessee and Chicago wasn’t great either and BY and this offense didn’t look like this.. So miss me with that Green Bay being a bad defense BS!! All year we haven’t made a bad defense look bad..

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...