Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Rookie Class Review (& a look at the top performing rookies)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm still undecided on which of 39/Mingo vs. 80/DJJ makes me more frustrated, but just want to reiterate this point again:

We used 9 picks, including a future 1st and 2nd (and DJ Moore) on these 5 players.

Last year, we used 5 picks on 3 guys ALREADY OFF THE TEAM (Matt Corral, Brandon Smith, & Kalon Barnes).  Icky, Barno, & Mays are all that remains.  

That's how you become the worst roster in football folks.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

TL,DR: Our draft was terrible

But for those interested, let's DIVE IN through 16 games.  I'm skipping the Bryce vs. rookie QBs chat because that's had plenty of discussion.

We had pick 39 & chose Jonathan Mingo:

Jonathan Mingo: 43 rec (85 targets) | 418 yards | 0 TDs | 9.7 avg

 

Drafted Receivers (TE & WR):

Jaxon S-N:  60 rec (88 targ) | 614 yards | 4 TDs | 10.2 avg

Jordan Addison: 66 rec (100 targ) | 854 yards | 9 TDs | 12.9 avg 

Zay Flowers: 77 rec (108 targ) | 858 yards | 5 TDs (6 total) | 11.1 avg

Dalton Kincaid: 66 rec (83 targ) | 589 yards | 2 TDs | 8.9 avg

Sam LaPorta: 81 rec (113 targ) | 860 yards | 9 TDs | 10.6 avg

notable after pick 39...

Jayden Reed: 60 rec (90 targ) | 681 yards | 8 TDs (10 total) | 11.4 avg 

Rashee Rice: 79 rec (102 targ) | 938 yards | 7 TDs | 11.9 avg

Tank Dell: 45 rec (75 targ) | 709 yards, 7 TDs | 15.1 avg (in 11 games!)

Josh Downs: 65 rec (95 targ) | 723 yards | 2 TDs | 11.1 avg

Puka Nacua: 101 rec (154 targ) | 1,445 yards | 5 TDs | 14.3 avg

More Notes:

Demario Douglas, Michael Wilson, & Donta Wicks all had more receiving yards than Mingo.  Marvin Mims has shown explosion/big play ability for Denver, and both Trey Palmer and Jalin Hyatt have come on at the end of the season for TB and NYG respectively.  

Luke Musgrave was having a very strong year but got injured.  Tucker Kraft (another rookie) has stepped in and played GREAT at TE.  

Mingo is the ONLY rookie WR with substantial receptions to have a sub 10.0 YPR avg

Q Johnston seems like the only one struggling as much as Mingo.

--

 

 

Okay then..onto the other big position need we tried to fill...we spent a packaged 93rd & 132nd pick on:

DJ Johnson: 6 tackles (16 comb) | 1 TFL 

Comparing Rookie Pass Rushers:

Will Anderson: 29 tackles (44 comb) | 7 sacks | 10 TFL

Jalen Carter: 18 tackles (30 comb) | 6 sacks | 2 FF | 8 TFL | 1 Def TD

Calijah Kancey: 18 tackles (25 comb) | 4 sacks | 10 TFL 

Tuli Tuipulotu: 35 tackles (48 comb) | 4.5 sacks | 2 FF | 8 TFL

Byron Young: 41 tackles (60 comb) | 7 sacks | 2 FF | 7 TFL

BJ Ojulari: 19 tackle (35 comb) | 4 sacks | 4 TFL 

after pick 80...

YaYa Diaby: 22 tackles (33 comb) | 6.5 sacks | 1 FF | 11 TFL *pick at 82, 2 after DJJ

Kobie Turner: 29 tackles (57 comb) | 9 sacks | 8 TFL *pick 89

The 132nd pick we traded:  Nick Herbig: 19 tackles (27 comb) | 3 sacks | 5 TFL | 2 FF

Karl Brooks: 10 tackles (18 comb) | 3 sacks | 4 TFL | 1 FF *pick 179

Notes:

Van Ness, McDonald, and a few others were behind talented edge rushers but still managed some nice work when they've gone in.  KJ Henry (pick 137) has had snaps since the Sweat and Young trades and look aight as well in WAS.  

--

 

 

REVIEW TIME!

D+ (I'm being kind)

We chose Mingo over some high performing rookies.

Luke Musgrave (TE), JuJu Brents (DB), Jayden Reed (WR), Tuli (EDGE), Brian Branch (DB), Rashee Rice (WR), Tyrique Stevenson (DB), & DJ Turner (DB) to name just a few, were selected shortly after. 

I'm not calling Mingo a certified bust, but it was NOT a good campaign.  He also didn't fit what we desperately needed at WR (quickness and route running).  He has a lot he needs to work on, isn't a big hands-catcher either.  

I'll give leniency on mid 3rd-7th rounders that bloomed because every team passed on them for a round after 39.   However, it should be noted that we gave up pick 61 in the Bryce trade, a pick just ahead of Marvin Mims, Tank Dell, Byron Young, & Josh Downs.

Moving on, we traded up for DJJ at pick 80 (Using 93 & 132). 

That's up 13 spots...and 3 of the next 4 picks after ours were impact rookies (Tyjae Spears, YaYa Diaby, Devon Achane). DJJ wasn't ready (age 25) and we needed to bring in an elder-Houston to help before the season began. 

Henley (LB), Ji'Ayir Brown (DB), Kobie Turner (DL) were right there as well all before pick 93 who could've warranted some argument in that trade up.

It's not an F because Robinson has played ST and hasn't looked terrible..but he's not an NFL starter.  It looks like Zavala may not even be suited for a backup role.  

--

 

 

A RECAP:

Going into draft season, we had 7 picks:

1-9 (shipped)

2-39

2-61 (shipped)

3-93

4-114

4-132 (shipped)

5-145

We ended up with 5 players selected, none have given us any comfort or any sense of security at their positions.  QB, WR, EDGE, OG, & DB.  Not a single one. 

In total, we used 9 draft picks (2 future 1-2024, 2-2025) and (1) DJ Moore on this 5 player draft class.  Let that soak in.  

9 picks and DJ Moore for Bryce, Mingo, DJJ, Zavala, and Robinson

The grade on this draft is hinging on Bryce, but if he doesn't work out, this could end up being one of the worst drafts in NFL history.  This is on the scouting team and Fitterer's drafting as much as the players/situation they're in.  The GM put the struggling talent in said position.    

Thanks for reading.

 Happy New Year!

 

Damn that is brutal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one final bit of analysis

That's 16 picks used in 2 years that turned into: 8 players! And Icky, Bryce, & Mingo are the only real guys left with long term potential (and that's a stretch to say). So, no mid-to-late round finds, maybe 4 guys left (from 16 picks) that are weighing more on the bust than success side of the spectrum.  The other 4 aren't long for being Panthers.  The book is not written, but holy hell.

We've also used 1 future pick on Smith-Marsette (2025s 7th)

In a league where so much of the draft is guesswork or dependent on building depth, everything, the worst thing you can do is limit your chances and don't balance out your risks.

That is a grand total of 17 picks used in 2 seasons/since the CMC & Anderson trades.  

I'd dare say this is the worst managed 2-year stretch for any franchise in some time.  

What a way to waste the capital gained from the CMC and Robbie trades...that was 6 added picks in total.  And I think there's a good argument we didn't get enough out of CMC's deal.  Teams wanted him and it didn't seem like we played hardball enough between SB contender/division rivals (LA & SF).

 

 

 

 

   

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive learned that you simply cannot judge rookies until the second full off-season. Rare exceptions- early draft pick cut or someone wins awards, pro-bowl, break records etc. 

That said, early returns are looking horrible. Even without the trades, just piles on....

Plus with bryce being the #1, its hard to not judge him. I will add this personal note, my aunt came over one sunday and never watched football her whole life. I had the game on and after about 2minutes;

Aunt-"My gosh that guy looks so small!?!?!"....."

Bas- "Yeeeaaaa that was the panthers 1st overall pick, whom they traded a kings haul for"....

Aunt- "Oooo my"

So I'll wait until TC before I pass along my opinions, but bear hands always is a good read. 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way you put it. People can argue whether Bryce will be good in the future but he definitely hasn't been good for 90% of his rookie season 

I don't agree with not grading picks in their rookie years. You can grade them year by year and by their entire career once they have more than 1 season. 

 

Draft was really bad, I'd give it a D as well. Hard to give any draft an F though. 

Edited by Hoenheim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

This is gonna go down as one of the worst drafts in NFL history.

If Bryce doesn’t work out (not that I’m by any means hoping for that), it very well could be and not hyperbole. 

I tried to avoid offering my own revisionist history scenarios…but the other possibilities between coaching hires and different draft scenarios is infinitely frustrating.

Draft wise, so many different routes without the #1 trade up…

Richardson-Tuli-Dell-Kraft

or a Stroud-Brents-Downs type one.

Hell, at this point I’m honestly wondering what a Jalen Carter-Jayden Reed-Hendon Hooker-YaYa draft could’ve been like. 

Anyhoo, we aren’t changing the past haha

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...