Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What coach(s) would actually make you happy with the hire


MGH1989
 Share

Recommended Posts

Slowik…

The success of Mike Shanahan’s coaching tree can’t be ignored.

Also, Slowik has worked on both sides of the ball at the NFL level and got his start as a defensive assistant for Washington and then became the defensive quality control coach for San Francisco.

To my knowledge, it’s rare for an NFL head coach to have professional experience on both sides of the ball which I personally believe sets Slowik apart from other candidates. He’s a well-rounded coach.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Bobby Slowik- He is my top choice for what he has done with Stroud and that offense

Ben Johnson

Mike McDonald 

But will Slowik scheme work with Bryce? Main thing I would be thinking as a potential offensive HC is will I be able to make an offense to get the most out of Bryce? Reich failed to adjust his offense, stubbornly. Bryce run offense is gonna be something completely different compared to a Stroud led offense.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The Lobo said:

Harbaugh and Ben Johnson. Preferably Harbaugh, although, if you can make Jared Goff look good, you’re a really good coach. 

I mean, maybe, just maybe….Goff just isn’t a bad QB.  He was a multi pro bowl QB that went to the SB.  People claimed that was just McVay being McVay.  Now he is a pro bowl QB again….and everyone claims it’s Ben Johnson. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Not sure but I want a coach that has the guts to play the best QB on the roster regardless of politics.

Yep, Young got his shot and it didn't go well. Now he needs to earn the starting position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, maybe, just maybe….Goff just isn’t a bad QB.  He was a multi pro bowl QB that went to the SB.  People claimed that was just McVay being McVay.  Now he is a pro bowl QB again….and everyone claims it’s Ben Johnson. 

Goff is definitely a good QB.  There should be no doubt about that.  But I think Johnson and Goff both benefit greatly from each other, which isn't a bad thing.  Johnson plays to Goff's strengths so well, and is able to adjust his scheme to maximize every player on the offense.  Even when Amon-Ra would have to miss time, guys like Reynolds would step up.  

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I would kill to hear what the coaching candidates say about Bryce during interviews 

If Tepper isn't budging on Bryce, he's going to have a tougher time than he thinks finding a HC.  Going into year two, nothing should be handed to Young.  The compromise will likely be if Young sucks again next year, the new coach can go out and get his QB in 2025.  Tepper will most likely demand Young gets at least one more year to pan out in 2024...even though it's clear to just about everyone he's not NFL starting QB material.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This next coaching hire doesn't matter.  He'll be here a season and a half, tied to Bryce.  When BY is a clear failure they'll ditch this coach and draft a QB again.

Sorry.  I wish I could see it differently, but I don't.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TarHeel69 said:

I don't care who they hire, as long as they are not another Dave/Nicole hand puppet.

Lol, you think Tepper is going to have dudes tell him how to run this organization?  I mean, he SHOULD, but billionaires don't tend follow the directives of other people unless it's within their own circle.

If the organization was smart, they would have a mole to get to Nicole ear and thereby Dave's.  Nicole is about the only person I think that can persuade/dissuade his stubborn arse.  So getting David to change his ways isn't the objective, but a confidant with some real NFL knowledge that can get Nicole's ear regularly to pass along to her hubby.

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BrianS said:

This next coaching hire doesn't matter.  He'll be here a season and a half, tied to Bryce.  When BY is a clear failure they'll ditch this coach and draft a QB again.

Sorry.  I wish I could see it differently, but I don't.

I don't disagree and I think the candidates are probably thinking the same thing.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Initially, I wanted Stroud but I thought the trade up meant that, whoever they chose, it was for a reason.  There was no pressure to do anything for the entire scouting team to do other than investigate every aspect of the top 3 candidates.  Stroud had his question marks, and I think it is possible that he falters this year.  Bryce had a much worse situation here in Carolina because we neglected the OL, traded our #1 WR, did not pick WRs well in the draft, traded our pro bowl RB, and seem to disregard the TE position altogether.  Bozeman was not a good fit and we relied on an improved OL in 2022 to suggest that we were set there when we were far from it.  Fitterer had no vision, no grasp of talent, and everyone in the front office and on the coaching staff were pretending to be gurus.  Our coaching staff was a group of men earning a lifetime achievement paycheck.  It all goes back to the years of neglect for the OL.  My theory?  If Stroud had come to Carolina, he would be as mocked and ridiculed as Bryce Young.   No, he does not have a cannon.  Chad Pennington was a weak-armed QB who had success and would have been even better if it were not for injuries.  Smarts is important at QB, and so are mechanics.  Before you can address Young's mechanics, he needs an OL, Running game, and weapons. We were not really able to run play action from under center for a few reasons--play action is not effective when you have to pass the ball--other than that, the QB must turn his back to the LOS for about 1.5 seconds.  When the QB has less than 2.5 seconds to pass the ball, that eliminates that part of the play book.  Heck, even the run option is minimized when there is immediate facial pressure.  SO those who want to talk about happy feet, bouncing, etc--they are symptoms of the problem, not the problem.  A weak arm?  Well, Young's arm is between Chad Pennington and Joe Montana--closer to Joe.  His are is not as weak as some think--but he has issues with the deep ball. When you are reacting to the defense and quickly have to pass, then that takes away the strength because you don't have the base to get power behind it.  I still wish we had taken Stroud, but we have Young and if you toss him out before giving him support, you are not wise, unsmart, not unfoolish, and rather elite in your failure to attain mediocrity.  Expect growth.  How much? Nobody knows.
    • Honestly, irrespective of Bryce, this is my hope for Canales. I hate hearing about him being a "QB whisperer." Because I don't give a rat's ass about him saving Bryce's career. Bryce either proves to be worth what we gave up for him, or it's next man up. I'm just excited to have a young, innovative offensive mind.
×
×
  • Create New...