Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers interview requests

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, Evil Hurney said:

Possibly missed in this is those are the ONLY two teams he has agreed to interview with thus far. 👀

Every team except the Raiders have requested; although the Raiders appear to be keeping things quiet.

That's something I missed too...

Interesting 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fjblair Enthusiast

fjblair

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, OldhamA said:

How do you know it's not the other way round/

Maybe they don't want to interview for us - we're not a quick fix.

It is the other way around. None of the top tier will interview because they do not want to work for Tepper and this putrid organization. They want to go where they can win. Carolina is where coaches and quarterbacks go to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

For what it's worth, ESPN made their predictions for the open jobs. Dan Graziano had us hiring Brian Callahan.

They predicted Johnson to the Commanders.

Rationale sounded a lot like throwing darts at a board. Don't think any of the media folks this time around really know who Tepper has in the #2 spot if/when Johnson goes elsewhere. 

Edited by UNCrules2187
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KBRed Community Regular

KBRed

Posted
Posted

Hopefully since there is a team of folks hired for our coaching search, there aren’t any moles in the operation, and we are interviewing more than we think. 
 

But, you would think the hot (not physically) candidates would be spotted in the airport or around town. /shrugs/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, KBRed said:

Hopefully since there is a team of folks hired for our coaching search, there aren’t any moles in the operation, and we are interviewing more than we think. 
 

But, you would think the hot (not physically) candidates would be spotted in the airport or around town. /shrugs/

Don't teams have to make that information public?  Don't think they can just interview a candidate on the low without anyone finding out, but I could be wrong.  Because they have to put the request in through the NFL anyway (not sure how that works with college coaches though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
31 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Rationale sounded a lot like throwing darts at a board. Don't think any of the media folks this time around really know who Tepper has in the #2 spot if/when Johnson goes elsewhere. 

Part of the discussion was that NFL people question whether candidates will want to tie their futures to David Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WUnderhill Grand Master

WUnderhill

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, KBRed said:

Hopefully since there is a team of folks hired for our coaching search, there aren’t any moles in the operation, and we are interviewing more than we think. 
 

But, you would think the hot (not physically) candidates would be spotted in the airport or around town. /shrugs/

Can we get a list of the physically hot candidates? That’s who we should be focusing on.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

we have a very solid defense in place already. we’re not in as bad a shape as the doomsayers in here let on. 

I agree. However, this love for an OC coach bothers me. There aren’t too many Shanahans around the league. I would rather go after a good defensive coordinator than a good Offensive coordinator, but the cupboard is a bit bear this time. I’ll be honest Harbaugh is the best Home Run hire of a generation. Belichick would at least get us competitive. I really don’t love any of the coordinators this time. Johnson is ok, but not a home run. If we can’t get Harbaugh, Belichick, or Johnson we should just promote Evero

Edited by philit99
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wolfcop Grand Master

Wolfcop

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, philit99 said:

I agree. However, this love for an OC coach bothers me. There aren’t too many Shanahans around the league. I would rather go after a good defensive coordinator than a good Offensive coordinator, but the cupboard is a bit bear this time. I’ll be honest Harbaugh is the best Home Run hire of a generation. Belichick would at least get us competitive. I really don’t love any of the coordinators this time. Johnson is ok, but not a home run. If we can’t get Harbaugh, Belichick, or Johnson we should just promote Evero

Agree with this. The Ravens DC is intriguing, but he would have to beat out Evero in my mind if your first 3 turn us down. Also, it’ll blow my mind if we don’t interview Harbaugh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...