Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who is falling for the Peacock Wildcard bullshitt

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

lightsout Grand Master

lightsout

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

Wow, the second I switched over to watch, a popup asked "Do you mind if Peacock shares your info with the NFL?" I told them they couldn't.

That's the neat part. They're still gonna. It's essentially a notice that they do. Your response just tells them how pissed average Americans are about it lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersATL Grand Master

PanthersATL

Posted
Posted

The Peacock playoff game averaged 23 million viewers (including the Miami and KC local broadcasts)

Its being referred to as the most-streamed live event ever in the US

for comparison, the most watched TNF Prime game averaged 15.26m (last novembers SEAvDAL game)

the Texans-Browns game averaged 29m viewers 

the Peacock game had a 6% larger audience than the same time slot playoff game last year, so NBC and the NFL will likely view this as a success.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

The Peacock playoff game averaged 23 million viewers (including the Miami and KC local broadcasts)

Its being referred to as the most-streamed live event ever in the US

for comparison, the most watched TNF Prime game averaged 15.26m (last novembers SEAvDAL game)

the Texans-Browns game averaged 29m viewers 

the Peacock game had a 6% larger audience than the same time slot playoff game last year, so NBC and the NFL will likely view this as a success.

 

I'm sure they will see it as a "success" (because they want to see it as such), but comparing a playoff game to a TNF regular season game isn't necessarily the best comparison. The fact that it had 6 million less than the Texans-Browns should tell them something. That's quite a difference.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
On 1/13/2024 at 5:45 PM, falconlynx said:

Imagine if they come up with a subscription service that combines everything we like to watch, including live sports, into one monthly payment for a reasonable price. So that we wouldn’t have to log into all these different streaming services and get nickel and dimed.

Oh wait, that’s what we had 5 years ago with cable (and it was at least reasonably priced in areas with competition).

You just knew this was the end result when all this streaming crap started. And just wait, the greed will continue to make it worse. 
 

Only way to get this to reverse is for us all to stop paying these prices for these largely worthless services. 


 

 

Cable was terrible. I pay way less for the services than I ever did for cable. That model is dead forever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCBlu Experienced

NCBlu

Posted
Posted

This is just the start.

A lot of dumb people out there who paid to see the game. They said it did better then the same time slot last year... Omg

Get ready for having to pay to see playoff games, becoming more common because as holes don't see that once they see you are willing to pay they will keep doing it.

The people missed there chance to stop this bs...

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lame Duck Grand Master

Lame Duck

Posted
Posted
On 1/15/2024 at 12:05 AM, TheBigKat said:

There will be more of this apparently

IMG_5661.jpeg

Peacock streams a ton of sporting events.  NFL was just never touched.  Soccer was moved to Peacock three years ago and that platform froze and crashed every week.  Folks better be glad it’s not 3 year ago quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • DavidEng
      26 first goal playoff thread

      By DavidEng · Posted

      Svech
    • jfra78
      Charlotte Hornets Offseason Moves

      By jfra78 · Posted

      Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • LinvilleGorge
      Maybe? Maybe....?

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...