Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Morgan named GM/President


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Basbear said:

GDQXV0XW8AAHjXk.jpg.f41b89ed0b0dd0b974ac86be281fc3ad.jpgGDQXV0XWQAAkr4-.jpg.81b5ad3056e654b88d060b0f54396975.jpg

 

recent picture of dan and dave, might as well start the "Your new HC of the carolina panthers..."

Yep. I thought so from the beginning 

lot of common threads 

I’m fine with their  hiring Canales.  They could do far far worse (and have)

Listen to some of his off the cuff interviews on YouTube 

he is a far cry from past stupidity here and has a really good coaching pedigree

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not convinced of that.

Smart teams can not wait for johnson without knowing he'll take the job. Agents should have talking with teams for months. You think four teams waiting for johnson til after after the SB, and then he goes "Im taking the bama job...". Smart orgs should already have the answers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PantherKyle said:

Not thrilled with hiring internally, but we just don’t know guys. Harder to know than a coach hire. Whose say is what in FO is tough for a fan.

all we can do is hope for the best.

we know he thought this roster was good.  We know he thought it was young over stroud.

 

That alone is enough to say fug this

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrBubba said:

If they have a Presser with questions, all reporters should demand to know what major decisions he disagreed with in last three+ years and what his advice was at the time.  

Haha yea. I'm sure the Charlotte media will hold them all accountable. They all know if they do, they get the Fowler treatment. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hired someone he already knew. That should tell you all you need to know. 

 

Dan is a Yes Man.

 

We needed to hire someone outside the franchise. Tepper was never going to do that. Yall can keep preaching false hope, not me I knew Dan was going to get the job. It was set up for him to replace Fitt. Loser owner makes a loser hire. Dan was a great player, but he's not the answer.

 

Now watch him hire a no name HC. This will be the cherry on top.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...