Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Did the panthers lose on the CMC trade?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

It’s not his success in SF that makes us lose the trade. It’s the Panther’s inability to turn the capital we got from the trade into something positive that makes us lose 
 

I’m happy for CMC the person and player.  Panthers are a mess right now ans I’m glad a special player is able to go somewhere and succeed.  If we trade Burns or any other player to a contender I will wish him well and good health.
Also hope his team performs good as long as it’s not the Cowboys or in the division or maybe another team that I choose to hate on a given day but generally speaking I like it when these young guys go elsewhere and succeed.  

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

CMC did want to be here. He was shocked that we wanted to trade him.

CMC is the son of a former NFL player and an absolute master at saying the right things on camera. He had missed the majority of the previous two seasons with “injuries” that at times seemed a little questionable. Hasn’t missed any time since he was traded! What a coincidence. 

He also ended up playing for his dad’s former head coaches son, who freaking babysat for him while he was growing up. It’s too perfect for him. And I’m sure CMC’s instagram girlfriend hated Charlotte. 

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had artificial surface and CMC was often injured.  He will be 28 next season-RBs, historically, peak at 27.  So he was not going to make a difference here as long as Tepper and his clown show are calling shots.  SF got a great deal, we got some picks that were like giving $ to a teenager at the fair--gone in 30 minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

He's a west coast kid his family is a west coast family his father has deep ties to the area.

He's where he wanted to be.

Ya'll need to accept it.

This is true, but he still didn't want to leave Charlotte. All anyone has to do is their research. Sure, he wanted to go to San Fran after learning that we were shopping him, but he was taken aback that we would even trade him at all. Those are the facts!

As far as accepting it, I don't care one way or another. Just like Pejorative Miscreant said, we fuged up on our end irrespective of CMC. I'm glad for him and wish him all the luck...except when he plays us.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...