Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Senior Bowl Targets


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, jfra78 said:

In 3-4 probably looking at DTs unless talking about an edge that can play outside LB 

Good point, I forgot scheme. I guess in general I mean pass rusher. We need someone to double up with Burns. Haynes has potential but his injury this year set him back so its still up in there air if he lives up to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"YAC King" Corley sounds to be translating in a new environment.  Strong route running and a YAC guy.  That's pretty in line with our needs.  I'm not interested in falling for pretty catches or 10.0 RAC style athleticism at WR this year. Give me route running, blocking, and speed.  

Elsewhere, Quinyon Mitchell at CB sounds to be having the best week of any prospect along with that Center Johnson.  

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robinson is sadly making me sad as he won't be there in the 4th or likely 3rd now.  Pair him with DB in any front and damn nice core. 

Maason Smith is another interesting DE for us and can kick inside.Then there is Gabe Hall and Jordan Jefferson for 3-4 ends later who can kick inside. 

Braiden McGregor as a 4-3 end or big olb in a 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2024 at 9:00 AM, rayzor said:

my favorite pick at #33. hope we can get him. his work/success with rattler and rattler's kind of throwing i think are exactly what we need with bryce. 

speaking of rattler, i wouldn't mind picking him up as well if he happens to fall to a later round. 

2nd thoughts about leggette if he can't get separation I don't want him.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, rayzor said:

2nd thoughts about leggette if he can't get separation I don't want him.

Yup, we’ve had enough guys who can win a contested catch in college but can’t get open in the NFL 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our first priority is protecting Bryce don’t care what wr is there at 33 if Jackson power Johnson is there run the card in he is a franchise center and if he gone grab the next center 

Edited by Panfan35
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Jamari Thrash is a name to keep an eye on. 

I picked him up in a mock draft last night.  After some of the raves from yesterday's practice.  Was chosen much later than he will likely be taken in the real draft after this week's practices.  

Edited by MrBubba
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/31/2024 at 5:50 PM, CPantherKing said:

Watch Ricky Pearsall. He's running the best routes at the Senior Bowl practices. I just hope his draft stock doesn't rise too much & he can be had by the 3rd/4th round.

It's a varied group of WR's.  Their are several skill sets, strengths and styles.  Also a couple athletic freaks.  Pearsall seems like a Keenan Allen comparison.  Or new school St Brown.  We need to throw two darts at that draft board. Fingers crossed Tez and Pearsall would be a good combo. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...