Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke -- 1st ballot HoF?


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, lumbeecheraw75 said:

that's a interesting list . Some random I pulled

 

Drew Brees QB 2026 38

1.9

 

Cam Newton QB 2027 17 1.55

 

Torry Holt (5x Finalist) WR 2015 24 2.18
Reggie Wayne (5x Finalist) WR 2020 17 1.21
Steve Smith Sr. WR 2022 18 1.13

 

 

Greg Olsen TE 2026 9 0.64
Kris Jenkins NT 2016 17 1.7
Thomas Davis OLB 2026 8 0.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here's a grenade for the thread - Cam and TD aren't HOF'ers - Cam might get in, but he shouldn't - so many QB's haven't gotten in that should be over him (Boomer, Phil Simms, Cunningham, McNair).  But as much as I love TD he really doesn't have the resume to get in.

Edited by Stingray3030
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

Here's a grenade for the thread - Cam and TD aren't HOF'ers - Cam might get in, but he shouldn't - so many QB's haven't gotten in that should be over him (Boomer, Phil Simms, Cunningham, McNair).  But as much as I love TD he really doesn't have the resume to get in.

Cam IMO deserves it.  Unicorn/impact IMO would be why I put him over and in. 

Will he actually get in?  Very doubtful.  The media has never fairly told the story of Cam Newton.   And there is no argument for him getting in without it acknowledged. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luke will be a first ballot and Smitty will continue to wait until the football monarchs decide he has paid his penance. Sucks but it is true. Cam will probably make first ballot (putting Smitty yet another year behind).

Thomas Davis will get in, but not on his first ballot, maybe like third or fourth. He's an amazing story and such longevity (and considering the dire circumstances he fought through), but outside of Carolina his notoriety just isn't as big. And that's a shame.

Greg. Dang, we all love him but let's be honest, he didn't have a HoF career. As Cris Collinsworth once said, if there was a Hall of the Really Good, he'd be there on the first ballot. He will, however, live on as one hell of a commentator I hope. 

Other Hall of the Really Good players we've had could include Moose, Ryan Kalil and Jordan Gross, Longevity, great games, just not the big names nationwide that get them to the real Hall.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Cam IMO deserves it.  Unicorn/impact IMO would be why I put him over and in. 

Will he actually get in?  Very doubtful.  The media has never fairly told the story of Cam Newton.   And there is no argument for him getting in without it acknowledged. 

Unicorn does not qualify anyone for a HOF - that is a career-based honor for the best players of their generations.  A guy with only 3 Pro Bowls in 10 years, a losing post season record, no Super Bowl wins, 1 MVP & AP.  

I would also argue he isn't a unicorn - Michael Vick, RG3, Lamar Jackson?  Rare but not the only one...and it is clear that Lamar is >> Cam - and if he ended his career today he isn't a lock for the HOF....much more likely but not a lock

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

Unicorn does not qualify anyone for a HOF - that is a career-based honor for the best players of their generations.  A guy with only 3 Pro Bowls in 10 years, a losing post season record, no Super Bowl wins, 1 MVP & AP.  

I would also argue he isn't a unicorn - Michael Vick, RG3, Lamar Jackson?  Rare but not the only one...and it is clear that Lamar is >> Cam - and if he ended his career today he isn't a lock for the HOF....much more likely but not a lock

I mean, Cam is a unicorn as a runner in the NFL.   There has been no one else like him in modern history in terms of how he ran and the threat he presented to opposing defenses.

and in terms of impact, Cam IMO was the true start of the normalization of the college read option and the league moving to schemes that fit what college QBs do well.   

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

I mean, Cam is a unicorn as a runner in the NFL.   There has no one else like him in modern history in terms of how he ran and the threat he presented to opposing defenses.

and in terms of impact, Cam IMO was the true start of the normalization of the college read option and the league moving to schemes that fit what college QBs do well.   

I would completely disagree that Michael Vick and Lamar Jackson don't qualify as the same level of running threat as Cam.  But even if they were not there it still doesn't qualify for the HOF.  Who else exactly is running this read option offense with high success in the NFL that Cam supposedly kicked off?  From what I see they have tried to normalize it without much success - the best example again is Lamar but you said he isn't like Cam (even though he is clearly better).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

If Devin Hester is a HOFer Cam better be first ballot. Annoying that Eli will get in even though he was probably never even a top 10 QB during his career. But his defense held the greatest offense of all time to 14 points and he played in New York so im sure theyll put him in

Hester was the best to ever do it at his position. Cam? Come on, man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stingray3030 said:

I would completely disagree that Michael Vick and Lamar Jackson don't qualify as the same level of running threat as Cam.  But even if they were not there it still doesn't qualify for the HOF.  Who else exactly is running this read option offense with high success in the NFL that Cam supposedly kicked off?  From what I see they have tried to normalize it without much success - the best example again is Lamar but you said he isn't like Cam (even though he is clearly better).

Vick and Cam Newton present 2 completely different threats to an opposing defense.    They aren't comparable players.  They are very different problems to solve for a D.  Cam is a unicorn in terms of how he ran, how he was used, and what it took to stop it.   

it's not just the read option.  It's the RPO and the complete normalization of the college football schemes and play into the NFL.  NFL teams finally embracing building around the college player vs trying to recreate them into dudes that fit existing pro systems.  Cam was really the lead in that regard IMO.   And the media, almost from the jump wanted to start crediting everyone that followed him for swaying the NFL in that direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good lord yes Luke is a first ballot hof’er. Only reason he wasn’t all pro his first year is he didn’t start at MLB immediately. 

Cam, sadly, is not. He needed that Super Bowl win. Yeah he revolutionized the position but that’s a narrative argument and the same voters that acknowledge that will remember him more for not jumping on the fumble. Not saying I agree with that  

None of us would say Russell Wilson is a hall of famer even though he (was on a team that) won a Super Bowl and has arguably better stats than cam.  

TD, Greg - Hall of Very Good. Greg just didn’t have a long enough run.

I think Smith gets in eventually  

All this is making me think of my second favorite panthers what if: beason realizes how good Luke is and accepts a move to WLB. 

Edited by electro's horse
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...