Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers plan to renegotiate the deal for RT Taylor Moton


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, blueandblackattack said:

Smart move. He's the only cornerstone on our o-line and the most expensive on the roster so far, so we gotta keep him but also find a way to make room. Still pretty young and hasn't missed much time. Very reliable. He's the closest thing to a right side Jordan Gross we've had. We gotta make room if we wanna keep this D intact and have room to make some free agent signings.

This. 

Moton is absolutely a stud and a leader on our oline. He has plenty left to be able to play. 

They want to extend him to lower his number, and keep him in. Panther uniform for a long time. No reason not to. 

 

This isn't kicking the can down the road. It is making sure we keep the best of our oline as we work to improve our oline. 

 

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

But why kick the can down the road? Save future cap space for when we are ready (hopefully) to sign some key FA to make a playoff run. 

Using the term “kicking the can down the road” implies this is a negative that we are trying to put off. Moton is a good player. This is just us extending him and saying you’re 30 and a great RT who we want to be here long term. I really don’t see the issue here 

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Using the term “kicking the can down the road” implies this is a negative that we are trying to put off. Moton is a good player. This is just us extending him and saying you’re 30 and a great RT who we want to be here long term. I really don’t see the issue here 

A lot of extensions tend to be backloaded. I don’t like the idea of backloading a contract and spending that extra to bring in more expensive FAs when we arent in a winning position. If they did it and front load it, it’d be fine. Id just rather embrace the rebuild, pay the big money now while we’re going to have a lot of lower cost guys, and save that cap space for when we improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I imagine that this is more likely an extension to get his cap number down for a few more years.

Prior to last year, Moton has consistently been good.  Good pass pro, good run blocking, great leadership.  Let's be real honest: the Reich/Brown offense was literally a flaming bag of feces.  Everyone ended up rolling around in it, covered in poo.  Moton is really good, and he needs to be retained.

I'm all for keeping him.  Also, I've about given up on caring what the salary cap is.  You have tools to continue to move money, contracts can be manipulated, etc.  Just get the guys here to play.  

What is the option?  Hope that Brady C is a good enough RT?  Draft one?  Spend capital on another starting quality RT?  I'd rather allocate more resources else where than try to replace a good, quality player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

This. 

Moton is absolutely a stud and a leader on our oline. He has plenty left to be able to play. 

They want to extend him to lower his number, and keep him in. Panther uniform for a long time. No reason not to. 

 

This isn't kicking the can down the road. It is making sure we keep the best of our oline as we work to improve our oline. 

 

 Backloading a contract for an aging player is the epitome of kicking the can down the road

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

 Backloading a contract for an aging player is the epitome of kicking the can down the road

Moton has been healthy and effective his entire career. Good OT's can last well into their 30's. There shouldn't be any discussion about getting rid of Moton unless he wants prime LT pay.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Moton has been healthy and effective his entire career. Good OT's can last well into their 30's. There shouldn't be any discussion about getting rid of Moton unless he wants prime LT pay.

Nobody is saying out right cut him or that he isnt productive, its just that the way his contract was set up and the fact that we are not winning in 2024 it just makes sense to absorb the hit instead of pushing that money, likely extending him longer to 4 or 5 years down the road.  That just doesnt make sense to me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Nobody is saying out right cut him or that he isnt productive, its just that the way his contract was set up and the fact that we are not winning in 2024 it just makes sense to absorb the hit instead of pushing that money, likely extending him longer to 4 or 5 years down the road.  That just doesnt make sense to me.

It actually does to me. I have no issue giving him an extension. It allows us to rebuild the rest of the OL and not worry about finding a guy at RT, as well.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

It actually does to me. I have no issue giving him an extension. It allows us to rebuild the rest of the OL and not worry about finding a guy at RT, as well.

he is under contract for 2 more years, the big 30 million hit is 2024.  We can still extend him after this year at a more reasonable rate.  The money he is owed for 2024 will get paid out no matter how you extend him.  The hit will come at some point and I would rather it be now instead of when we might be good and need to add some players from f/a.    Going from a 13 million cap hit to 30 is fuging nuts. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

he is under contract for 2 more years, the big 30 million hit is 2024.  We can still extend him after this year at a more reasonable rate.  The money he is owed for 2024 will get paid out no matter how you extend him.  The hit will come at some point and I would rather it be now instead of when we might be good and need to add some players from f/a.    Going from a 13 million cap hit to 30 is fuging nuts. 

I have no problem extending him, converting a big chunk to a signing bonus(lowering his cap hit) and having more money to either roll over to 2025 or spend on Luvu and Brown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
    • I dont know. He seems like a bigger douche now than ever. I didnt hate him for being a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...