Dan Graziano: Panthers likely trade candidates IF Michael Pittman and Tee Higgins become available

[RumHam]

Pittman isnt a number one. Send burns to cincy for higgins

[CamWhoaaCam]

1 hour ago, Ghostofdelhomme said:

Disappears for weeks at a time. Pittman is better. There is no answer. Better to hope you catch lightning in a bottle in the draft. We can’t Hurst and Sanders and Chark our way to a competitive roster

We should have hired you for GM. You know the key to success!

[ChuckWag78]

All comp being equal, I would take Pittman over Higgins. 

[Ghostofdelhomme]

3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

We should have hired you for GM. You know the key to success!

Only if you replace Joe Person. your intimate knowledge of football is humbling

[ECHornet]

3 hours ago, RumHam said:

Pittman isnt a number one. Send burns to cincy for higgins

In 2023, Pittman finished #4 of all WRs in receptions. #14 in receiving yards. 
 

With a rookie Anthony Richardson and Gardner Minshew throwing him the ball. 
 

Pittman is easily a #1. The better question is should Pittman be considered a top 10 WR. 

Edited March 11 by ECHornet

[ChuckWag78]

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

In 2023, Pittman finished #4 of all WRs in receptions. #14 in receiving yards. 
 

With a rookie Anthony Richardson and Gardner Minshew throwing him the ball. 
 

Pittman is easily a #1. The better question is should Pittman be considered a top 10 WR. 

Exactly. He made plays every week. People saying he isn't a #1 didn't watch him at all last year. 

[Aussie Tank]

Dionte Johnson from the Steelers would better suit Bryce and be cheaper IMO 

[strato]

38 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

• Dionte Johnson from the Steelers would better suit Bryce and be cheaper IMO 

Mind explaining why?

[Aussie Tank]

44 minutes ago, strato said:

Mind explaining why?

Someone who wins with route running getting quick separation. 

[pantherclaw]

A lot of over reaction over something that is just rumors. 

[Jackie Lee]

Just fuging sign Tyler Boyd as the #2 and draft a dude. No trading for players

[csx]

4 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Exactly. He made plays every week. People saying he isn't a #1 didn't watch him at all last year. 

The term Number 1 is just too vague. People throw it around without any  definition for it.

[csx]

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

A lot of over reaction over something that is just rumors. 

We have about 4 or 5 rumor tweet threads that people are flipping out over

[tukafan21]

4 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Exactly. He made plays every week. People saying he isn't a #1 didn't watch him at all last year. 

I've said it so many times before on here, but far too many people confuse being an NFL #1 with being a fantasy #1

So they only look at a WR #1 as someone who is a top 10-12 player at their position, even if there are 32 starters in the NFL at that position.

Sure, everyone wants a Top 10 player at any position, but only 10 teams in the league have one of those