Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

They aren't giving up their 1st this year, so unless we get their 1st next year as part of a deal, I'm going to be furious.

Two 2nd's is not the trade to make, I'd rather trade him for 1 pick towards the end of the 1st round than the two 2nd's

It's the exact same mistake we made with the CMC trade in taking the point value based on the stupid draft chart.  You can't do that with players of this caliber, it doesn't add up on the field.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KSpan said:

That warrant was signed as Fitterer turned down the Rams haul.

This^^^  Turning down that trade was a colossal mistake. They were never going to get anything even close to that offer ever again.  That ship not only sailed, it sank to the bottom of the ocean. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

a quarter takes 1 roster spot, and three dimes takes three.  Maybe that was what he meant.

i take the Gettleman quote (its paraphrased of course) as the point being if you have a true difference maker at one spot, it overcomes three guys who are say shaq thompson types. great is so hard to find its carries premium value. a top five/ten guy at a position changes the whole team. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...