Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jonathan Jones: NO conversations between Panthers and Bengals for Higgins


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

When the draft is LOADED at WR, why trade draft capital and pay $80m for him?  I was not sure how I felt about it, but I am relieved, honestly.

 

Pick #33 is very valuable.  There are about 18 hours between picks 32 and 33, and a team has that long to present a package to move up.  Many teams will have players on the board that fell to 33, and some will attempt to move up to grab that player at 33--we are in a position to get our guy at 39 have a mid second round pick, and an additional third rounder.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

When the draft is LOADED at WR, why trade draft capital and pay $80m for him?  I was not sure how I felt about it, but I am relieved, honestly.

 

Pick #33 is very valuable.  There are about 18 hours between picks 32 and 33, and a team has that long to present a package to move up.  Many teams will have players on the board that fell to 33, and some will attempt to move up to grab that player at 33--we are in a position to get our guy at 39 have a mid second round pick, and an additional third rounder.

 

I would be stunned if morgan doesnt trade down from 33.  Especially if a qb like pennix falls

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Captroop and Sydney Sweeney!!!

 

There has been some talk, mainly by Captroop himself, about Sydney Sweeney being a total smokeshow. This has led some to make dubious connections between the Huddle's cat poop, and arguably the most marketable actress in Hollywood at the moment.

Sources say that Captroop has never actually talked to Sydney Sweeney, has no ability to do so, is married, and his wife is vehemently against the idea of polyamory.

 

So yeah. Pretty much no connection or anything worth reporting. Carry on.

Nope. She is not.  She has a cavity in one of her molars and her taste in fashion is questionable.  Her eyes are not 100% horizontally parallel--and that is a deal breaker for me. 

Untitled.jpg.0151a1447383d9bf85802bf30171ea12.jpg

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you pay massive money to to OGs and then proceed to trade high draft picks and pay even more massive money to a WR seeking a huge deal 🤔 

We're supposed to be rebuilding.  Putting us in cap hell for the next 4 years for a WR isn't smart imo. Rebuild the team through the draft.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Captroop said:

Captroop and Sydney Sweeney!!!

 

There has been some talk, mainly by Captroop himself, about Sydney Sweeney being a total smokeshow. This has led some to make dubious connections between the Huddle's cat poop, and arguably the most marketable actress in Hollywood at the moment.

Sources say that Captroop has never actually talked to Sydney Sweeney, has no ability to do so, is married, and his wife is vehemently against the idea of polyamory.

 

So yeah. Pretty much no connection or anything worth reporting. Carry on.

I like the cut of your jib. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stingray3030 said:

I would LOVE to have Tee Higgins - but trading those 2 picks is the wrong choice.  I don't see Tee on our radar any longer....we have nothing to offer without Burns.

Those two high 2nd round picks give you a chance to start the rebuild after a disastrous few years. 

They shouldn't be traded for anything short of Patrick Mahomes. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

fug it. We've already gutted the D. Just go all in at this point. I want no more Bryce excuses.

They are gonna get this thing so stacked ands simple a high schooler could run it, it’ll probably make Young look just appetizing enough that they don’t change horses. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...