Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wonnum to Panthers


 Share

Recommended Posts

Key here is creating a good enough rotation until we can find the flagship talent at EDGE.
 

The draft isn’t that great for it but there’s some interesting guys. Last year though..ugh Tuli would’ve been a monster in Evero’s defense.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely no one should think this guy is meant to effectively compare to Burns, and if someone does then they're insane. He is meant to provide a portion of that production at a fraction of the cost in combination with a couple more players, and the odds are that most of the end/edge group this year are short-term trials (thus the 2-year contract). That's how it was always planned to play out, and if one of them suddenly develops into something more then that's icing on the cake. 

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Key here is creating a good enough rotation until we can find the flagship talent at EDGE.
 

The draft isn’t that great for it but there’s some interesting guys. Last year though..ugh Tuli would’ve been a monster in Evero’s defense.

 

Yeah pretty sure Evero has said in the past that he'll send 5/6/7 guys on a blitz if he needs to. Probably the case this coming season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah pretty sure Evero has said in the past that he'll send 5/6/7 guys on a blitz if he needs to. Probably the case this coming season. 

I hope he utilizes Jewel in that delayed blitz hes so effective at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Absolutely no one should think this guy is meant to effectively compare to Burns, and if someone does then they're insane. He is meant to provide a portion of that production at a fraction of the cost in combination with a couple more players, and the odds are that most of the end/edge group this year are short-term trials (thus the 2-year contract). That's how it was always planned to play out, and if one of them suddenly develops into something more then that's icing on the cake. 

This^

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

And who was beside DB most the season? I barely watched lol. Tuttle? A'Shawn should be a little upgrade to what he was working with inside last season

Yeah, if we can sign another pass rusher, we might have a sneaky good defense. Don't tell @rayzor though. I wouldn't want him to give him any false hope. But, yeah, all this was made possible by trading Burns away. There's some irony in there somewhere.

Honestly, if we could get decent center play, we might be ahead of schedule. Everything leads back to Bryce though...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Yeah, if we can sign another pass rusher, we might have a sneaky good defense. Don't tell @rayzor though. I wouldn't want him to give him any false hope. But, yeah, all this was made possible by trading Burns away. There's some irony in there somewhere.

Honestly, if we could get decent center play, we might be ahead of schedule. Everything leads back to Bryce though...

Animated GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, KSpan said:

Absolutely no one should think this guy is meant to effectively compare to Burns, and if someone does then they're insane. He is meant to provide a portion of that production at a fraction of the cost in combination with a couple more players, and the odds are that most of the end/edge group this year are short-term trials (thus the 2-year contract). That's how it was always planned to play out, and if one of them suddenly develops into something more then that's icing on the cake. 

He is Haynes replacement, assuming Haynes is not back--not Burns' replacement.  That is why we are still pursuing Chase and Clowny.  I am guessing it is going to be Clowny, and I am guessing it will be a one-year contract.  Of course, we could whiff on both, and that would necessitate drafting one.  I think we could draft a Sam 0LB and a rush/Jack OLB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

He is Haynes replacement, assuming Haynes is not back--not Burns' replacement.  That is why we are still pursuing Chase and Clowny.  I am guessing it is going to be Clowny, and I am guessing it will be a one-year contract.  Of course, we could whiff on both, and that would necessitate drafting one.  I think we could draft a Sam 0LB and a rush/Jack OLB. 

I feel like he is more of a YGM replacement. I think he starts opposite of Young/Clowney/draft pick. He is a big upgrade over YGM and not far from recent Burns when you look at a complete package. If we could sign Chase Young (or Clowney) and Fuller it will set us up nicely in the draft IMO. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...