Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Gallup to visit with Panthers


methodtoll
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Debatable whether or not Williams at this point is more than marginally better, mainly because they both have some post injury baggage, Williams  coming of a much more recent injury, the same injury, gives more pause for concern.

But I'm not going to debate that....I'd be fine with him too. Both carry s risk. Both would be worth it. Both would give us tough targets we didn't have before.

But the way you talk, picking up Gallup or Williams would exclude us picking up a WR or maybe even two on draft day. It won't. The inclusion of either of those guys, just like all the other additions, raise our bottom line of talent across the board.

For a talent deprived team, that's a good thing... getting more talent in here than what was here before.

Lol what I never said we shouldn't take a WR.

 

I said we shouldn't double dip which many have been suggesting. If we don't sign another WR then I could see the possibility of us double dipping. I expect us to sign another WR though which explains the visits we have next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fanpanther said:

Yep terrible throw but one an nfl wr should catch

That’s not a terrible throw. It’s Mingo having some of the worst field awareness since Dan Orlovsky was playing QB. 

Edited by ECHornet
  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Gallup had studs ahead of him eating up targets.  What was Mingo's excuse?  The juggernaut known as Adam Thielen?

Which might imply that Mingo was facing better CBs.   Too many variables, but the # of targets is a good point, but we are also comparing a vet to a rookie season with a rookie QB behind a bad OL.  Dallas had Prescott and a good OL--and we both know that improves timing.  A QB forced off his spot probably does not put the ball where it needs to be when it needs to be there.  "The NFL average catchable throw rate from a clean pocket is 79.4%, compared to a lowly 60.5% when pressured."  That percentage suggests that the difference of catchable balls was not that different.

Don't get me wrong, I would take Gallup, but my point was that he should not be paid $11.5m here. 

Edited by MHS831
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Gallup targets: 57

Mingo targets: 85

To make sure you saw this:  Bryce was hesitant and had a horrible OL...."The NFL average catchable throw rate from a clean pocket is 79.4%, compared to a lowly 60.5% when pressured."  That percentage suggests that the difference of catchable balls was not that different.  Dak, with a solid OL vs. a rookie with a terrible OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I am not one of those people who will not admit if I am wrong or hear a perspective that contradicts my view.  The target issue is a good point. but there are a lot of variables.  You could argue (illogically) that Mingo got more targets because he was open more.  We only assume the reason--and how often were Mingo's targets when the QB had broken from his delivery point and was trying to make a play.  I hope you are right if we sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

He's got a defender within a fingers graps of his face and he's rolling out to the right towards the sideline. If he throws the ball anymore inside he'd be throwing across his body while on the run with a defender in his face. Where exactly is he supposed to put that ball aside from the perfect spot he threw it to on the sideline? If Mingo didn't overrun/adjust his body in a weird angle that should be an easy pitch and catch

Leading the receiver towards the sideline allowing him to drag his feet and make the catch low and away .  The pass was behind the wr causing him to try and stop or reach back making it a tough catch but still should have been caught . Tough throw also but one 1st overall pick should make.   Both seem terrible maybe this year will be better if not both should be gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...