Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

With the 33rd Pick in the NFL Draft

DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

jfra78 Veteran

jfra78

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, CRA said:

I know people are feeling the Luke comparison.  But Payton got too much damage already on that body coming in for me. 

Yea If we going ILB in the second go Cooper.  I'd only take Wilson if available in the 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ColumbusCounty Proficient

ColumbusCounty

Posted
Posted

The offers: 

A 2025 First... Hell Yes. Thing is.... we have about a 10-30 percent chance of this scenario happening. 

The more probable option would resemble something like the Cards who traded #33 last year and got: 

#41, #72 and a '24 3rd from the Titans who took Levis at 33. 

**The trade included #33 and #81 for #41, #72 and a future 3rd**

I'm not a fan of that haul. But being at 39 does give us some playroom. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfra78 Veteran

jfra78

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, ColumbusCounty said:

The offers: 

A 2025 First... Hell Yes. Thing is.... we have about a 10-30 percent chance of this scenario happening. 

The more probable option would resemble something like the Cards who traded #33 last year and got: 

#41, #72 and a '24 3rd from the Titans who took Levis at 33. 

**The trade included #33 and #81 for #41, #72 and a future 3rd**

I'm not a fan of that haul. But being at 39 does give us some playroom. 

Yea I'd rather pick 33, I think one of our goals should be not to emulate the Cardinals

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Prickles Veteran

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted

I wouldnt trade out of this position and would use on a BPA. If somebody wants to trade up from a lower spot and offer us something like a 4th rounder this year I would just tell them to pound sand and keep our pick. This is one pick away from a first rounder and we need it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
chknwing Mentor

chknwing

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

This pick is usually a very hot commodity and often traded. 

We are not ready to contend in 2024.

I would very much consider taking a 2025 1st round pick for this draft choice.   We will certainly get offers from other teams.  

Would you take a 1st in 2025 for #33 and maybe a late rounder pick in 2024.  

Plus, with such a deep WR class we would certainly still be able to pick a quality WR. 

I dunno, trading away the pick until next year my conflict in what ever BS they told the free agents to get them to sign here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Albert Breer talks about Dave Canales

      By Basbear · Posted

      Very Odd, seems someone is lying about the "love" between Seattle and canales.  I did read some about B.johnson and he said he wanted a stable good job and that 5 out 8 teams that filled this past season, will be open again in three years. I somewhat get his point, but he's lost millions the past two years waiting. Plus great job are never open cause great team don't fire their HCs. He put lots of time and sweat into the lions and wanted to enjoy the good times longer.    I do think tepper made other coaches not want to be here. That all-star staff had as you stated had connections around the league and coaches are no different when someone contracts them and goes " How was it Carolina ??'.... " Love the area, hated the work environment/owner". They did get Brian Callahan to interview and had a 2nd one lined up, but in just one interview titans hired him. I'd much rather had him or just name evero HC instead.  Nobody wanted Ron Rivera either and he interviewed everywhere. No one wants this job..... even the jags got recent SB winning Doug Peterson.... I truly think Carolina coaching rep is in the dump and they fuged up waiting for Callahan. Panic move. This is my pure guess too, Jim Caldwell is the acting/real HC and canales is the OC.
    • strato
      Albert Breer talks about Dave Canales

      By strato · Posted

      I go back to the hole the Panthers put themselves in and his positive track record with getting production from ‘problem’ QBs. Which, we have one.  I go to the idea people were putting forth on these younger HC prospects - that maybe you take a guy early and let him grow and give him all the help you can. Like a QB go figure. I think that is pretty much where it is right now. I think Canales could be good.   
    • Waldo
      Albert Breer talks about Dave Canales

      By Waldo · Posted

      It's like with Friterer was the same as Canales. 'He's a great guy' and everyone loves him but Seattle had a HC opening with ties and no interview, even with a playoff appearance in a weak NFCS to boost his name. The NFL is all about ties and connections. It's so much more a small pond than most sectors could be so the corporate NFL bs is sooooo much thicker. All of those openings and no HC interviews? B Johnson is an anomaly, like a Kiffin, where usually you have guys that will go whereever to take a promotion even if it looks terrible for a distance, Wilks to Arizona comes to mind. It's weird and interesting how the NFL mirrors and then deviates from the rest of corporate America in their MOs. 
×
×
  • Create New...