Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers Visits/Prospect Meetings Tracker


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Ben Sinnott is a really intriguing TE prospect. Like the dude a lot for us 

me too.  I think we will go TE some how some way

I wonder how many of those edges were before Clowney signed. 

I like to look for patterns--some of these names are to show interest to players who might go undrafted.

Here is what I noticed--

  • NO true Centers.  There are no signs that we might take a Center in the draft.  On this list, Haynes is listed as a C/G but he did not play C at UConn.  RG.
  • The Morgan influence suggests that they might take an ILB "dawg" early.  Wilson and Cooper are mid second rounders at least--if not earlier.
  • They are really doing homework on the WRs.  We have met with 8 of them.  Could we take 2?
  • To me, it is scary that they have checked out Wiggins (CB Clemson).  175 lbs and not good in run support---we need our CBs to come up and contain.  He reminds me of Henderson.  Someone talk me out of it.
  • I do not understand the lack of attention to the CB position.  Neither RIchardson nor Wiggins are good in run support, and Richardson is simply not a good CB considering his athleticism.  He is a fifth or sixth rounder imo. 
  • Based on these lists, I would say WR and ILB in the second round.  TE maybe in the third.

 

 

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:
  • NO true Centers.  There are no signs that we might take a Center in the draft.  On this list, Haynes is listed as a C/G but he did not play C at UConn.  RG.

I added the C next to his name. Daniel Jeremiah mentioned Haynes can play all 3 interior spots during the NFL Combine 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, MHS831 said:

me too.  I think we will go TE some how some way

I wonder how many of those edges were before Clowney signed. 

I like to look for patterns--some of these names are to show interest to players who might go undrafted.

Here is what I noticed--

  • NO true Centers.  There are no signs that we might take a Center in the draft.  On this list, Haynes is listed as a C/G but he did not play C at UConn.  RG.
  • The Morgan influence suggests that they might take an ILB "dawg" early.  Wilson and Cooper are mid second rounders at least--if not earlier.
  • They are really doing homework on the WRs.  We have met with 8 of them.  Could we take 2?
  • To me, it is scary that they have checked out Wiggins (CB Clemson).  175 lbs and not good in run support---we need our CBs to come up and contain.  He reminds me of Henderson.  Someone talk me out of it.
  • I do not understand the lack of attention to the CB position.  Neither RIchardson nor Wiggins are good in run support, and Richardson is simply not a good CB considering his athleticism.  He is a fifth or sixth rounder imo. 
  • Based on these lists, I would say WR and ILB in the second round.  TE maybe in the third.

 

 

Agree with everything in your assessment. I think Gilmore may still be in our future. Don’t forget we resigned Troy Hill who should start at nickel. He is really good at run support and he can help on the outside too.

Edited by Beast_3000
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

There is no direct correlation between visits/senior bowl interviews and whom actually gets drafted.  

It may happen. It may not. Yes, the odds are high it may be. No sure thing.

I was gonna make this disclaimer too.

Many of the guys teams meet with are for a reason. Not always the case teams are sold-these are job interviews at the end of the day.

Could mean they saw promise on tape but heard weird things about the guy.

So many possibilities and sometimes a guy that is on these lists could have quietly been scratched off our board entirely due to, well a bad interview or visit. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with OP notion, QBs always get credited for game winning drives even if they do minimal. Just last night Caleb got credited for a GE drive when they basically ran the ball the whole drive and only had to go 36 yards.   And there are drives where Bryce could of had a game winning drive if not for a Legette drop vs Philly or a Chubba fumble vs Tampa 
    • You are actually, genuinely comparing Bryce to Jimmy fuging Pickles? Jimmy accounted for 3 touchdowns in his 10 starts in 2010. In Bryce’s 10 games post benching last year, he accounted for 20 touchdowns. Jimmy threw three touchdowns in 2010. Three. Bryce has thrown 10 touchdowns through 6 games. He is currently on track to throw for 3300 yards, 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Wtf are we even talking about anymore. I mean seriously
    • Tepper? The guy that directs the coaches towards goals that he set for them… that guy. He is the one.    I don’t think he ever was going to be expelled from class, they had him come in for garbage time maybe the 2nd week he was benched.  I will say this. People said he wasn’t under pressure the last part of the year when he did better, but he was fighting for his career and that’s pressure. And he saved his career too. I don’t reject him for those kinds of things I reject him for the physical things. I have always brought it down to he has slim margin for error and has to be perfect. People with the tool set have a little fatter margin for error. Why make it harder on yourself? Got nothing to do with hating him.  I am no statistician but game that margin thing out a lot and see how that works. 
×
×
  • Create New...