Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This organization is a joke


 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Do we have to do this every single time another team signs or trades for a player whose name you know? There’s other teams in the league doing their own things, get over it.

I think it's some kind of rule that freaking out is required when another team signs a player.  

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RumHam said:

While most are hoping to strike gold in the 2nd (which we did one time 25 years ago) houston now went from the worst in the league to the best. It all starts with tepper. They made a move happen and we still trotting out practice squad for Bryce, who wasnt the right pick. Chicago will be poised. Most teams in our position end up better, but not this franchise. What a joke.

Wow!...Tell us something we DON'T know!  Thanks for all the informative incite....Not sure what I would be thinking without this post. We already know this...for the last 6 seasons. You act like you got this big epiphany...

Edited by Johnstonny
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tr3ach said:

Second off I dont like the idea of trading draft picks for potentially the deepest posistio

Same here. I mean this is almost a historically loaded WR class.

If anything, this makes me question the Texans. They might have just lucked into something good with Stroud the way the Patriots did with Brady.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Diggs bitched about Josh Allen at QB. How do you really think it would've played out with him having Bryce Young at QB? Trading for Diggs would make sense on Madden but it would've been a fuging disaster in reality.

Im sure Rayzor thinks it would have been fine. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Same here. I mean this is almost a historically loaded WR class.

If anything, this makes me question the Texans. They might have just lucked into something good with Stroud the way the Patriots did with Brady.

I could see if it if you are in hardcore win now mode because drafting a player will always be a gamble but where the panthers are I would much rather them draft multiple receivers to gamble on if they have to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Speaking of this loaded WR class, if we don't come away with at least two WRs I would call it not just missed opportunities, but a fail.

And I don't mean a 7th round special teamer as one either. 2nd and 3rd worst case scenario. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well yes we are trying to strike gold in the second round. That's the only way to build a roster. You have to draft well. There is no way around it

Diggs was a 5th rounder by the way.

Edited by csx
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
    • The Panthers aren't building a Bryce Young roster. Alabama didn't recruit personnel to fit a Bryce Young scheme. Canales' approach is to build an NFL roster (which they didn't have last season) and then cater his scheme and playcalling to what the players do best. The team is not pigeon holing itself into an offense that doesn't fit any other QB. Their goal this off-season was to provide NFL average or better talent to the offense - period. Very little to do with matching personnel for  Bryce Young's skillset or lack thereof.
    • lol the time lapse version of Panthers breakdowns
×
×
  • Create New...