Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ALERT: 🚨 Is DJ Chark re-signing with Panthers or signing with Falcons?


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's just not a fit with Bryce. His strength is going deep. Bryce's biggest weakness is the deep ball.

Yeah not understanding some people who want vertical guys in the draft either. Just gonna be burning calories for nothing, Safeties aren't gonna be fooled by it to abandon the middle of the field. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Navy_football said:

How many passes over 35 yards are thrown a game? How many are completed? I feel like taking the shots are as important as hitting them, to keep the defense honest. The first step is to take more shots and calling plays/schemes that make them early reads in the progression. 

Fair enough.

However, the threat of a allowing a quick one if you screw it up, is there? Or is Not there? 

Big effect on the defender. An actual threat needs to exist.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HardcoreHokie said:

This board is not very good at troubleshooting this issue.

Are the people having this issue on iPhone, Android, Windows, Mobile or PC, MacBook?

Chrome, Edge, Firefox?

And the people that it “just works” for after “a few seconds”, what are you using?

Clearly this is also Twitter vs X links related, but need more info on what y’all are using when it does/doesn’t work.

@TheSpecialJuanif they keep crapping on you about this (after many months of zero progress), please start a new thread about it and I’ll help troubleshoot it.  I’m in IT and I know good and well it’s not you, it’s a one-off technical glitch.

Haters gonna hate and then pile on.

Edited by HardcoreHokie
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chark doesn't really move the needle much for me. Packers game was really the only time he caught everything whereas he seemed to drop every other big play chance he got.  Also the injury history and the fact that his statline for his Lions stint was quite similar albeit with one less start. 

500 yards and 3/5 TD plus unreliable availability? Yeah, I'd rather roll with a rookie.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HardcoreHokie said:

@TheSpecialJuanif they keep crapping on you about this (after many months of zero progress), please start a new thread about it and I’ll help troubleshoot it.  I’m in IT and I know good and well it’s not you, it’s a one-off technical glitch.

Haters gonna hate and then pile on.

It's Elon Musk's fault.

No really, he threw that tantrum and wanted to rebrand twitter to x and the embed script is set to work with 'twitter.blahblah' links instead of 'x.blahblah' links.

We as mods don't have the permissions to edit the embed script, so as the great philosophizer John Fox once said:

Fresh Prince Reaction GIF by MOODMAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like the receiver type that the Panthers are targeting, that Mingo won't have to worry about playing time.  He'll be looking for a new employer.   

All this coaching turnover has it's cost on player development.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

He killed it with Williams in college. Bryce is gonna flip the narrative on him this year with a much better oline better weapons and competent coaching. He’s still the same player that most analysts loved 

Why do we need a vertical threat? Its like you guys just dont get it. 

The opposing D can stop their deep zones at 25 yards and never have to worry about Bryce throwing it over their heads.

Even if he does manage to get it over them, he only completes his deep passes at like 30% so nothing to even worry about.

The field is condensed with Bryce at QB and there is no way to get around it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pantherclaw said:

46.1 yards. 

That's Youngs average of yards per catch with passes over 20 yards.  College yes.... proof he can still sling it. 

Completed at 36% in college lmao that translates to like 15-20% in the NFL, even Mac Jones was completing his deep shots at 50% in college.

Bryce is a bum, this season is not going to be any better, the only way we will win more games is by going run heavy and hiding Bryce. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, strato said:

Fair enough.

However, the threat of a allowing a quick one if you screw it up, is there? Or is Not there? 

Big effect on the defender. An actual threat needs to exist.

This is the key, average starting corners makes $10M a year (see Jackson, Donte). Unless they regularly gets beat deep, as every talking head will find a pff-type stat "it's a concern he was was best deep three times last season" to sound smart.

We sometimes forget these guys are first and foremost looking out for themselves. And seeing a burner on the other side of the los will make everyone back off a little, regardless of what the coach said about the deep accuracy of the QB. And the cb like just as bad 5 yards behind the receiver even if the qb overshoots him by 10 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I appreciate the relationship with Bryce that Chark developed, I just didn't see enough production.  The backbreaking drops were the worst thing.  If he would come back on a 1 year min, great, but if I'm DJ, I go somewhere to try to prove I deserve a decent payday.  I'm not sure returning to the scene of the crime that was the 2023 offense is a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...