Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Dave Tepper would review play call data, review with Reich

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Did we not critique the play calling in here? It was awful. This was the worst offense we’ve ever had. Everyone was criticizing our shitty offense. I’m glad he at least acted quickly. We needed a new coach and GM. I’m still not happy with the GM choice as there’s been nothing good in house from 2018 to 2023.

If I had to choose between a random huddler and Tepper to call plays for my make believe team it wouldn’t be Tepper, just sayin

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

At the end of the day we have to concede one major point no matter how much we agree Reich and the outgoing staff were clearly not the answer. Having a starting QB who was clearly phsyically limited as a passer and not being allowed to bench him would have doomed many coaches current and former. That is why Canales has such an uphill battle ahead of him. It's that time of year where memories get hazy and hopium is abundant but the truth still has to be acknowledged.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gapanthersfan Veteran

Gapanthersfan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Well we didn’t have a top coaching staff, we’ve had the worst coaching in the league for the past 4 years.

Do you expect it to stop with our current staff? Tepper passed on Belicheck because he knew Bill wouldn’t stand for that crap. I’m on record before we even went on the coaching search that Tepper would never hire someone he couldn’t influence. I sincerely hope for the good of our franchise it stops. 
 

Would Reid? Tomlin? Carrol?  Harbaugh? Parcells, etc ever be ok with the owner critiquing plays?

We’re trying to attract and keep good coaches and players. I hope he sees this and stops with the Mickey Mouse ish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beast_3000 Experienced

Beast_3000

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

 Trying to gather an understanding why you feel this is helpful. What would be the purpose of this since his football acumen has shown to be much lower than his business acumen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, frankw said:

At the end of the day we have to concede one major point no matter how much we agree Reich and the outgoing staff were clearly not the answer. Having a starting QB who was clearly phsyically limited as a passer and not being allowed to bench him would have doomed many coaches current and former. That is why Canales has such an uphill battle ahead of him. It's that time of year where memories get hazy and hopium is abundant but the truth still has to be acknowledged.

Exactly, Canales is brought in to be a quarterback whisperer. He wouldn't have made a sideways move, so head coaching job and money it is. It's a lot to ask of one guy but he couldn't turn down the money. If it doesn't work out he still gets paid, I'm most interested in to what lengths do they exhaust the Bryce Young experiment if it's not working, that will tell us more about the stubbornness of Tepper than anything

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, csx said:

Fantastic application of a strawman argument right here.

That was really just a light hearted joke, with some truth in it at the same time

I’m not arguing on the internet with anyone lol I’ve stated my 2 cents that’s all there is for me

but you may need to take a break, it’s not that serious

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, MtnJax said:

I think 2.5 seasons of the Rhule experiment shook up Tepper to the point he felt he needed to direct Reich into whom to hire and then feel the need to sift through data and have conversations about play calling 

And we got worse when he decided to get more involved

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)

Huddle: the play calling sucks, fire this coach

Also Huddle: How dare the owner use resources to come to same conclusion.....with some unrelated nonsense about owner vs fans calling plays

Edited by csx
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • toldozer
      Canales is holding us back

      By toldozer · Posted

      I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • frankw
      This Bryce Guy (General BY Discussion)

      By frankw · Posted

      You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • Bama Panther
      NFL admits the TMac catch should not have been overturned

      By Bama Panther · Posted

      It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...