Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Dave Tepper would review play call data, review with Reich

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Did we not critique the play calling in here? It was awful. This was the worst offense we’ve ever had. Everyone was criticizing our shitty offense. I’m glad he at least acted quickly. We needed a new coach and GM. I’m still not happy with the GM choice as there’s been nothing good in house from 2018 to 2023.

If I had to choose between a random huddler and Tepper to call plays for my make believe team it wouldn’t be Tepper, just sayin

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

At the end of the day we have to concede one major point no matter how much we agree Reich and the outgoing staff were clearly not the answer. Having a starting QB who was clearly phsyically limited as a passer and not being allowed to bench him would have doomed many coaches current and former. That is why Canales has such an uphill battle ahead of him. It's that time of year where memories get hazy and hopium is abundant but the truth still has to be acknowledged.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Gapanthersfan Mentor

Gapanthersfan

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Well we didn’t have a top coaching staff, we’ve had the worst coaching in the league for the past 4 years.

Do you expect it to stop with our current staff? Tepper passed on Belicheck because he knew Bill wouldn’t stand for that crap. I’m on record before we even went on the coaching search that Tepper would never hire someone he couldn’t influence. I sincerely hope for the good of our franchise it stops. 
 

Would Reid? Tomlin? Carrol?  Harbaugh? Parcells, etc ever be ok with the owner critiquing plays?

We’re trying to attract and keep good coaches and players. I hope he sees this and stops with the Mickey Mouse ish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Beast_3000 Proficient

Beast_3000

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, FatChad said:

I think as an owner he is allowed to critique and get explanations for play calling post-game.  If anything, I'm glad he is interested in learning more about the game.  I'm sure most if not all owners do this.  

 Trying to gather an understanding why you feel this is helpful. What would be the purpose of this since his football acumen has shown to be much lower than his business acumen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, frankw said:

At the end of the day we have to concede one major point no matter how much we agree Reich and the outgoing staff were clearly not the answer. Having a starting QB who was clearly phsyically limited as a passer and not being allowed to bench him would have doomed many coaches current and former. That is why Canales has such an uphill battle ahead of him. It's that time of year where memories get hazy and hopium is abundant but the truth still has to be acknowledged.

Exactly, Canales is brought in to be a quarterback whisperer. He wouldn't have made a sideways move, so head coaching job and money it is. It's a lot to ask of one guy but he couldn't turn down the money. If it doesn't work out he still gets paid, I'm most interested in to what lengths do they exhaust the Bryce Young experiment if it's not working, that will tell us more about the stubbornness of Tepper than anything

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, csx said:

Fantastic application of a strawman argument right here.

That was really just a light hearted joke, with some truth in it at the same time

I’m not arguing on the internet with anyone lol I’ve stated my 2 cents that’s all there is for me

but you may need to take a break, it’s not that serious

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jackie Lee Grand Master

Jackie Lee

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, MtnJax said:

I think 2.5 seasons of the Rhule experiment shook up Tepper to the point he felt he needed to direct Reich into whom to hire and then feel the need to sift through data and have conversations about play calling 

And we got worse when he decided to get more involved

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted (edited)

Huddle: the play calling sucks, fire this coach

Also Huddle: How dare the owner use resources to come to same conclusion.....with some unrelated nonsense about owner vs fans calling plays

Edited by csx
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Mini camp tweets

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • tukafan21
      Mini camp tweets

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • LinvilleGorge
      BREAKING: Panthers interested in Justin Simmons

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...