Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Select Xavier Legette WR - Pick 32, Round 1


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Tbe said:


This team once again got tunnel vision on one guy.

This might be my biggest issue with the trade.

It points to the same behavior that led us to drafting the fewest prospects in the league over the past 3 years.

They need to let the draft come to them and stop chasing ‘their guys’.

Well said.   We literally told him he was our pick

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, KSpan said:

TMJ really didn't though. He was the third receiver on that stellar group and has 1600 yds in 3 years; Mingo's one year was more yards than TMJ's best year. TMJ being a stupid pick as well doesn't make Mingo better and Carolina just spent another high pick on another 1-year wonder college WR, though XL's peak appears much higher than those 2.

We aren't really on a different page here. I'm just expecting nothing NFL-worthy from Mingo.

He had 23 touchdowns in 2 seasons. Most of us assumed TMJ would be a major red zone threat.

At the end of the day he seems to have fallen into the Dwayne Jarrett category. He just doesn't want it.

Maybe Mingo could end up the same. Too early to call.

Wayyyyyyy too early to call to throw our 1st round pick this year into the same mixed bag with them.

Let's get him to camp.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think its sadly humorous how some Huddlers are already calling him a bust (in so many words).  Unreal. 

Cam Newton was essentially a one year wonder SEC player and we took him #1 overall. 

I mean, I get he had a season at junior college.  But no one has ever factored that before for other players as meaning that much. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

That's sort of been the story of us recently. Shooting for the moon and falling into the ocean instead. 

The trade up was just stupid. But, we will see if the player is worthwhile. 

Given our propensity to pick WR's that don't contribute I'm not hopeful. I've been  conditioned to believe that.  The dreaded words 'developmental high prospect' are worrisome.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

 

At the end of the day he seems to have fallen into the Dwayne Jarrett category. He just doesn't want it. (or the Henderson category--maybe this is why Morgan specifically mentions DAWGs. )

Maybe Mingo could end up the same. Too early to call.  He had an average year for a rookie WR on a very subpar team.  Good point.

Wayyyyyyy too early to call to throw our 1st round pick this year into the same mixed bag with them. YUP.

Let's get him to camp.

I am not sure how they will use Legette.  First, people are disregarding the new KO rules and how he might play out on special teams.  Secondly, he is known for contested catches and crossing routes--I see him in motion quite a bit, based on that skill set. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

as Leggette "fan"....the only negative I think really applies to the pick outside of maybe ideally drafting him slightly later is Bryce Young is our QB.  And I think Leggette pairs better with a big arm that gambles.  Not sure Bryce is really the type thrower that can get the most out of Leggette. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

as Leggette "fan"....the only negative I think really applies to the pick outside of maybe ideally drafting him slightly later is Bryce Young is our QB.  And I think Leggette pairs better with a big arm that gambles.  Not sure Bryce is really the type thrower that can get the most out of Leggette. 

Young has absolutely demonstrated the ability to drive the ball down the field when the protection is there. The hashmarks dont expand at the pro level.

i actually wonder if we’ll see Leggette used more as a weapon underneath though while he develops while Johnson is used to stretch the intermediate zone. I know he had lots of big shots at SC but I think his biggest strength is probably with the ball in his hand. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, frankw said:

He had 23 touchdowns in 2 seasons. Most of us assumed TMJ would be a major red zone threat.

At the end of the day he seems to have fallen into the Dwayne Jarrett category. He just doesn't want it.

Maybe Mingo could end up the same. Too early to call.

Wayyyyyyy too early to call to throw our 1st round pick this year into the same mixed bag with them.

Let's get him to camp.

It's perfectly fine to consider their college performances all together - they're all young players who showed varying strengths in limited years/roles. How does that translate to the NFL? Dunno, but there are absolutely similarities that can be discussed. We only know for sure that TMJ is not NFL material and Mingo did not look good last year, not individually or in the context of the terrible offense.

With respect to XL, as I said before I don't follow college football so have no real opinion, but just looking at stats alone he did absolutely nothing as a receiver for 4 years and then boomed. That could indicate sudden development or it could indicate flash in the pan. No disagreement that only time will tell. 

Edited by KSpan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a point that few seem to value.  The coaching staff last season, for the most part, was the "dream team" of sorts, a bunch of older guys resting on their laurels.  What happens when you reach that point is you start leaning on your experience and you want to stay on the horse that brung you-less willing to accept newfangled concepts or adapt with the changing dynamics of the league.  With the exception of Evero, we were dinosaurs.

Canales has a young staff and he preaches coaching.  Even with Andy Dalton, the first day was going through basic QB mechanics.  He said he does not want to see coaches standing watching drills with their arms folded, meaning that he wants them to be teaching during the drills.  Bryce commented about Corbett--"Even on IR, he asks more questions than anyone else."  In the past, our players have not developed after drafting them, so I get the cynicism.  However, I think this is a new day, based on these tea leaves.  Positivity, teaching, learning--the culture has been toxic and many of us are poisoned with negativity. 

The draft is mining for talent--and you draft for 4-5 years.  We talk about "developmental" and "upside" but if the player is not up to your high level of standards, you want to bury him before day 1.  Part of being around a toxic culture. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tr3ach said:

I dont compare him to Mingo besides measurables.   Hes a little older and not as tall but I compare him more to Shenault as far as player type.

That is mostly wrong and let me tell you why. Shenault is no where in the vicinity as far as playing speed. He doesn't have near the acceleration. But...the main reason why they are different is that Shenault has poor ball tracking skills, while X has exceptional ball tracking skills, which consequently allows him to win those 50-50 balls. It also means that X is a legitimate threat down field, but Shenault is relegated to plays within five yards of the line of scrimmage. So X will be able to do what Shenault can, but Shenault can't do what X can. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have preferred more of a technically strong WR, but they were obviously in love with the guy.  I don't hate the move up 1 slot, as it costs almost nothing.  The 5th year option is kind of whatever though.  It could end up being useful, but there's a good chance its not.

If Legette is a star, he's going to be extended before that 5 year.  And if he's a bust, he isn't gonna make it that long.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...