Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Draft: Day 3 (Rounds 4-7)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, TD alt said:

I wouldn't count out Rice either, though @CRA doesn't want him.

I mean, where matters.  I didn’t want him at the top of the 4th at 101 given what was there.  Have it now. Looks like 32 teams thought the same that round 

I loved Ruke.   Would have hated him where Atl got him. 

I would have loved Shipley where the Eagles got him.  4th is my ideal spot for building a RB committee.  A drafted committee is all I want at RB.  Featured RBs is old era football.  Would have hated him in the 2nd. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Why is the Mizzou CB Kris Abrams-Draine dropping? Most places had him as a solid 2nd rounder.

He is tops on my board---not in any order, but the bold items are of interest to me:

Austin Booker Edge Kansas

Cam Hart CB N Dame

Brenden Rice WR USC

Christian Jones OT Texas (again?)

Kris Abrams-Draine CB Missouri*

Malik Washington WR Virginia

Sedric Van Pron-Granger C Georgia*

Caelen Carson CB Wake

Mohamed Kamara Edge Colorado*

Hunter Nourzad C Penn State

DJ James CB Auburn

Jarvis Brownlee, Louisville*

Beaux Limmer  C Arkansas

Javon Solomon, Edge Troy

Nehemiah Pritchett CB Auburn*

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, where matters.  I didn’t want him at the top of the 4th at 101 given what was there.  Have it now.

I loved Ruke.   Would have hated him where Atl got him. 

I would have loved Shipley where the Eagles got him.  4th is my ideal spot for building a RB committee.  A drafted committee is all I want at RB.  Featured RBs is old era football.  Would have hated him in the 2nd. 

True. That qualification makes it much more understandable. I didn't want him with 101 either. It wouldn't have made much sense given who was still available. I think that we made the correct choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Troys99x4 said:

I know they’d never do it to Bryce, and don’t hate on me for saying this. But if Rattler is there… I’d take him. Let him know that Bryce is the guy, but why not?

To be fair to Rattler he matured a lot the last two years and had a really bad OL last season.  The problem with him is that he isn’t very consistent 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Have to wonder what that means for others in their wr room

Deebo or Aiyuk one is gonna end up being traded. I'm surprised it didn't happen during or leading up to the draft.  Must not have liked the offers and they're waiting on an injury and/or training camp realization of 'uh oh, we NEED a WR" to set in to up the value.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Troys99x4 said:

I know they’d never do it to Bryce, and don’t hate on me for saying this. But if Rattler is there… I’d take him. Let him know that Bryce is the guy, but why not?

They could sign him as a udfa. Unless someone just has to have him and use a 7th on him. He's no threat to take anyone's job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

To be fair to Rattler he matured a lot the last two years and had a really bad OL last season.  The problem with him is that he isn’t very consistent 

Yep. Great arm talent. Shows some real flashes. But he's just never found any sort of consistency. Hard to imagine he'll find it in the NFL.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

To be fair to Rattler he matured a lot the last two years and had a really bad OL last season.  The problem with him is that he isn’t very consistent 

Yeah agreed. I truly do believe that Bryce will be the QB we drafted him to be. But it’s the NFL insurance is key and Canales could probably develop him, worst case scenario a really good backup. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...