Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Training Camp day 1


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Iceup said:

https://x.com/FPFO_Podcast/status/1816126144317366490

One of the aforementioned Sanders runs.

Oh good god, anyone here on the huddle would have had a 20 yard gain there too. 

With respect to the team, it's just one play but man, looking like that off-tackle/edge defense from years past on that one.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Oh good god, anyone here on the huddle would have had a 20 yard gain there too. 

With respect to the team, it's just one play but man, looking like that off-tackle/edge defense from years past on that one.

or...maybe investing in the O-line is paying off? Canales did say that he wanted to emphasize the run this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

or...maybe investing in the O-line is paying off? Canales did say that he wanted to emphasize the run this year. 

 

first thing I thought was we didn't set the edge.  Watched again, Clowney was there but Icky pushed him out of the lane.  Icky is really good in the run game.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Oh good god, anyone here on the huddle would have had a 20 yard gain there too. 

With respect to the team, it's just one play but man, looking like that off-tackle/edge defense from years past on that one.

Naw…I would have dusted Bootle down the sideline and made a house call!

Touch Down Football Season GIF

 

 

Edited by Iceup
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

or...maybe investing in the O-line is paying off? Canales did say that he wanted to emphasize the run this year. 

It's impossible to say anything definitive either way based off of one play in shorts beyond that Sanders and 'explosive' are two words that don't typically go together, which is why I worded it as I did. That said, Clowney did get trapped upfield (and looked a bit unhappy about one thing or another at the end), the guard did a god job of stopping and then getting around the DL to move 2nd level, the MLB sucked in/was a step late/got caught by the guard getting around that corner, and the lane created was a great one that any Huddler would have gained yards from as opposed to Sanders being 'explosive'. 

It's the exact type of defensive look that Carolina has deployed and been giving up yards in for years now. Will be interesting to see how things play out when everyone is in pads and going full speed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KSpan said:

It's impossible to say anything definitive either way based off of one play in shorts beyond that Sanders and 'explosive' are two words that don't typically go together, which is why I worded it as I did. That said, Clowney did get trapped upfield (and looked a bit unhappy about one thing or another at the end), the guard did a god job of stopping and then getting around the DL to move 2nd level, the MLB sucked in/was a step late/got caught by the guard getting around that corner, and the lane created was a great one that any Huddler would have gained yards from as opposed to Sanders being 'explosive'. 

It's the exact type of defensive look that Carolina has deployed and been giving up yards in for years now. Will be interesting to see how things play out when everyone is in pads and going full speed.

Of course, I wasn't trying to throw shade at your comment. Just giving a different perspective on just a singular play. We've seen Bryce connect with DJ Chark last year in training camp and thought it was a premonition of things to come for the season but look how that turned out. But I guess Chark did have the most TDs and long receptions compared to our other WRs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...