Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young won't play in preseason opener


Recommended Posts

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

If I'm Canales I want to get at least a series with me on the headset, Bryce at qb, and Corbett at center in a game environment on the road so I know where we are at communication-wise. I'd much rather have that than go into week 1 assuming whatever happening in practice is going to automatically transfer over to an actual game

100 percent fair 

I’m under the impression that Canales doesn’t trust going into this matchup. Yeah that’s not good on paper but it’s a preseason game away and I never trust teams who “want to prove something” like new England who WILL be with us on the top 10 of the draft.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

100 percent fair 

I’m under the impression that Canales doesn’t trust going into this matchup. Yeah that’s not good on paper but it’s a preseason game away and I never trust teams who “want to prove something” like new England who WILL be with us on the top 10 of the draft.

Yeah, those were Bill squads that were willing to injure other teams in the preseason but I get that side of it. Actually I wish they had signed 2 camp arms just in case Plummer and Luton both get injured just so our wr depth guys can get fair shots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I have zero faith in Canales until he gives me reason to, but that's a function of Teppee's ineptitude moreso than Canales himself.

Yeah I'm basically with you; but I do believe in letting these guys do their jobs.

I have absolved myself of getting too attached now, so however it goes this year I'll be having fun watching football on Sundays

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, KSpan said:

I have zero faith in Canales until he gives me reason to, but that's a function of Teppee's ineptitude moreso than Canales himself.

Yeah I'm not optimistic but I'm also not pessimistic about Canales.  I'm trying to be fair with him, but it's pretty hard with Dan given he's not new.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Seems like he's generally a Fox/Rivera/Wilks style run first guy but with just more pre snap motion. He's admitted he's not a young offensive play calling guru. I'm expecting 2012-18 Seahawks without the yolo balls which sounds super boring. Maybe some late stage Drew Brees dink and dunking mixed in

Yeah, which doesn’t sound like a formula for much success.  Seattle needed those YOLO plays and while old man Brees was successful he was a legit top 10 all time QB going into that neutered brand of football…..not just some hyped up super processors (which we while Bryce is smart isn’t actually that) 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/6/2024 at 3:51 PM, L-TownCat said:

I understand the jimmies being rustled and some of it is justified.  My counter to this is that o-line is a big ol hot pile of steaming trash.  Why get the munchkin murdered when it doesn’t count?

When you only win 2 or 3 games a year the entire season doesn’t matter. If he gets hurt then it will be an easy decision to say goodbye. Sink or swim time.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Seems like he's generally a Fox/Rivera/Wilks style run first guy but with just more pre snap motion. He's admitted he's not a young offensive play calling guru. I'm expecting 2012-18 Seahawks without the yolo balls which sounds super boring. Maybe some late stage Drew Brees dink and dunking mixed in

IMG_0861.thumb.jpeg.662db873aca882d0f7f1d9764fa97ffb.jpeg

He obviously uses motion a lot more than that dinosaur Reich but Canales is pretty much right in the middle  

 

 

Edited by *FreeFua*
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Interesting point 5 mins in. How come Bryce doesn't need the reps right now, but last season when we were out of any contention it was important for Bryce to finish out the season instead of seeing what the offense looked like with a proven vet like Dalton? 

Because clown show that’s why.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a quarter of preseason, game 1 in the new format, football. This is such a bad look from every angle if Bryce is healthy. Bryce being durable is his only positive trait on the NFL field to date anyways. The pre-season is just about to kick off for them and they are already a clown show. WTF has really changed since last year? They are going to run the ball so much more in the season but can't for quarter? Clown show must go on I guess. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I can't wait to see the QB they pick after putting together this oline...

idk who is putting together or making the decisions  but whoever that might be probably Canales has Zavala as the starting LG with Damien Lewis out right now with injury & a healthy Brady Christensen on the bench unbelievable 

Canales oL is going to be big bodied &  RB friendly 

Edited by bandu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Waldo said:

It's a quarter of preseason, game 1 in the new format, football. This is such a bad look from every angle if Bryce is healthy. Bryce being durable is his only positive trait on the NFL field to date anyways. The pre-season is just about to kick off for them and they are already a clown show. WTF has really changed since last year? They are going to run the ball so much more in the season but can't for quarter? Clown show must go on I guess. 

we are still largely the same clown show.  This isn't a rebuild.  We basically changed offensive playcaller and scheme.  Same owner, largely the same front office outside of a face swap, same QB, same O advisor, same D staff.  

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we went LB at 19, the LB at 51 better be head and shoulders the BPA on our board. I was thinking more like 1st or 2nd and then double dipping in the mid-rounda But yeah, if we went LB back to back jn the 1st and 2nd and they turned out like Star and Short I don't think anyone would be complaining. Well, not many anyway. There's always gonna be a few no matter what. LOL 
    • I have been doing a bunch of mock drafts and this one interesting scenario popped up that made me question myself. I know our needs edge, mike, OT,wr, and secondary. This situation Love fell to 19 and I know we don't NEED a RB. But if we stay out at 19(I don't think we do) I don't think I could say no to love. If this team really believes in BPA and love is there at 19 who realistic is better than love at this point? Love is a top 5 talent, there is no akeem messador or Caleb banks or Kenyon Sadiq type player I think I would rather have than love. He would make Bryce life much easier, he's a homerun threat on a offense that lacks speed. He's essentially modern day Reggie bush to me and I think he could play alongside Chubba on passing down potentially as a slot and be the speed threat we really need. I think it's a bit crazy but I would be willing to wait til the second round and see who falls at edge(I think we land Chubb or loyd in free agency) maybe chase TJ parker if he falls or Rodriguez or golliday in the second/third. What say you?
    • They have also beaten the Rockets, Lakers, Spurs, and Nuggets... 
×
×
  • Create New...