Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Saints Game Day Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

He was my 1A and Stroud was my 1B. I thought the pick between them came down to the interview and background process to see who you trusted most to put in the work required. There were just waaaaaay too many questions about Bryce's physical tools. He pretty much had ever physical red flag a QB can have. You can't trade up to #1 overall for that and I thought it was baffling how the entire NFL media just talked past it.

I'm convinced that Tepper has a heavy hand in the roster, but doesn't have an eye for ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Why would you

…is the roster the same 

come on man

 

Why not is the question.  another year under a d coordinator . Outside of burns who did we lose that was game changing . They added to safety position . Added to linebacker i felt we got better lbs this year than last . We had Deion jones starting for us. And 3string cbs and still was solid so again why would i feel like they’ll be/look this bad 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VintagePanther said:

Why not is the question.  another year under a d coordinator . Outside of burns who did we lose that was game changing . They added to safety position . Added to linebacker i felt we got better lbs this year than last . We had Deion jones starting for us. And 3string cbs and still was solid so again why would i feel like they’ll be/look this bad 

You win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...